Minutes - 20051017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

"nominate", and he is okay with "produce." He would like to leave the door open for a better word. He said that the bottom line is that there are already two County Commissioners in the rural area. Chair Carey said that he recognizes that there is no way that lines can be drawn that will produce any particular philosophy on the Board of County Commissioners. He does support an option that allows Commissioners to be nominated in a district. He has come full circle because he used to oppose it. He thinks that a nomination in the district and an election at-large would accomplish some of the objectives of all of the groups. He wants to preserve the at-large election. Commissioner Faushee agreed with Chair Carey an bringing forth one proposal that allows nominating from the district and an at-large election. She said that this would most likely address the philosophical issues. She said that her first choice would not be to do this, but she thinks that if they are going to respond to what they have heard, then they should at least bring forward a proposal. Commissioner Gordon said that maybe the best solution is to hold open how it is going to be, because she does not think the County Commissioners are ready to narrow it down. Commissioner Gordon made reference to principle #6: "Any district plan should provide African-Americans, women, and other minorities an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice." She said that she assumed this meant that African-Americans, women, and other minorities would be given the same opportunity as Caucasian males. Commissioner Halkiotis said that it is important to note that this is already being accomplished and there are few places in the world where this is being accomplished. This is the first time that there have been two African-Americans on the Board of County Commissioners. He suggested adding some verbiage that says this is already being accomplished. Chair Carey suggested adding language that would "maintain" this equal opportunity. Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the last principle about not increasing the divisiveness in the County and said that they have tried to accomplish this by bringing people together. He said that because he is conservative about making change, he goes back to page three where the staff contacted 22 counties similar to Orange County and 21 used districts for residency purposes only. His concern is that they do not leap too far in trying to act to a legitimate concern, but make it more divided. He said that it seems that there is a standard way of doing this in North Carolina. He said that to go from the current system to a district system is a large step in the direction of accommodating the concerns that people have raised. Commissioner Halkiotis supported Commissioner Jacobs' comment. He said that they could learn from these 22 other counties. Geof Gledhill said that Commissioner Jacobs' comment is valid, but there are a significant number of pure district systems among County Commissioners. There are 14 pure district systems. Chair Carey said that the situation is different in every county. He has found that there are varying degrees of happiness with the district systems. He wants to do what is best for Orange County now. Commissioner Halkiotis made reference to the last principle: "District lines, and any efforts to establish districts, should not exacerbate perceived divisions within the County," and said that the word "perceived" is a very dangerous word. He suggested taking this principle out and Chair Carey agreed. Commissioner Gordon suggested taking out "perceive" and say that, "The new system of voting should not exacerbate divisions within the County. Commissioner Halkiotis suggested, "Any district plan should foster greater participation in the election process by all citizens." The Board agreed with this language. Commissioner Gordon asked for information about the implementation process and how and when the district boundaries will came into effect.