Minutes - 20050929 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Pam Jones, an Orange County employee, stated that there would be demonstration areas for composting and recycling. The schools bring busloads of school children out now and the current building cannot accommodate them. Sally Greene said the question is whether the educational function is an essential public service. Pam Jones stated that it is an essential operation to the facility. It is difficult to split the two uses. Solid waste staff on a daily basis will use the meeting space. Sally Greene stated that it did not strike her as an essential public service. John Link said that Section 3 of the tA~ater and Sewer Agreement does not define "essential sei•~~ice." Elective bodies will have to wrestle with it. Going down Rogers Road in tei7ns of the se~~•er might well be a good idea for the three governing bodies to consider outside the enterprise process of the solid waste facility because we use solid waste fees and tipping fees to operate the primary services of the landfill process. The aspect of using solid waste revenue is not something that we can do. Joal Broun stated that members of the Carrboro Board of Aldermen feel strongly about connecting the Rogers Road neighborhood. She voted against the transfer because the deal made for the neighbors was a poor one. Six years later we have had a growth among pockets of neighborhoods developed under different ordinances that have water and sewer because the other previous neighborhoods were developed without water and sewer. We undervalue having individuals to live next to a landfill, economically what that means and socially what that means. If they ~~•ere that popular, people who were living in million dollar houses would be living next to the landfill. Let us look at this really critically. It is narrowly in the rural buffer. They live next to the landfill and we do not have to. Mark Kleinschmidt stated that this area will be part of Chapel Hill--we want that community. It is a community that we value. It is setting up a false dichotomy to say that because we do not want to punch into the rural buffer to put water and sewer in, and to go against what has been along-standing agreement of three governments that it is someho«-• an insult to the Rogers Road Neighborhood. We do not have to compromise that value. A small area plan has been a priority of mine for the past for years and it is a top priority to get that done for the council. u~'e want to get that done -every opportunity that we have to get the sewer line pulled up into that area, we have done. What we have before us right now is the addition of what is an ancillary activity to what is an essential public service that does not need water and sewer. Joal Broun asked if they have to wait another six years to get sewer. 14lark Kleinschmidt said half have gotten it in the last t~~-•o or three years. Jim t~'ard said he feels strongly that this line of the rural buffer is something he does not want to cross until he fully understands the ramifications of penetrating into it with water and sewer. He would not want to cross that line, not knowing what is in that Pandora's box. The idea of using this as an opportunity to get sewer in this area to get in Rogers Road «~ithout crossing rural buffer sounds great. Additionally, looking to Chapel Hill and town operation facilities in terms of its ability to provide some of this meeting space for you. You are saying that the landfill capacity will be used up in five years, and recycling and solid waste construction is fifteen years that is a wink of the eye. He stated that he would rather see us invest in something else. I hear that you need those meeting spaces but it is not a good enough reason to put sewer into the rural buffer.