Orange County NC Website
SOLID ~`'ASTE ISSUES <br />John Link, Orange County Manager, stated that both Chapel Hill and Carrboro had responded to Moses Carey's <br />August 10th letter regarding the County's idea of extending water and sewer to the County's new solid waste <br />facility to be located on Eubanks Road. This facility is being proposed for this site because the current facility <br />is located off Airport Road on University property. It seems to be very functional to combine administrative <br />staff with solid t~--°aste staff located on Eubanks. Although the MS W landfill will reach capacity by 2010, at <br />least through 2020 there will be solid waste operations where they are now located. It is believed that the <br />County will be using this facility for the next 20 years at least. It is a good idea to have the facilities all <br />together. <br />Rod `'isser, Assistant County Manager, stated that in April there was approval of a conceptual design. The <br />County Commissioners want sizeable meeting space to accommodate training area for staff, community <br />meeting space, public meeting space, and educational facility for students. He stated that the property is <br />located just inside the rural buffer and has an approved perk site. The building can be located closer to the road <br />if sewer is provided to this property. The County Commissioners have approved a pump and lift station. The <br />ultimate design will be subject to OWASA's appro~•~al. <br />John Link said that the co-location of these t~vo facilities is part of a master plan that the County Commissioners <br />have been working on for three or four years. He stated that they feel the operation of the solid waste facility is <br />an essential service and thinks it meets the criteria in Section 3 of the water and sewer boundary agreement. <br />Mark Kleinschmidt asked ho«~ the meeting space is an essential public service. <br />John Link said they want the facility large enough for meetings of staff, municipal employees, and school <br />students. <br />Mark Kleinschmidt stated that the need for the landfill is essential but he does not see the need for w ater and <br />se«~~er for a meeting space. You would not propose a meeting space and then say it was an essential public <br />service. <br />l~loses Carey said that they would say the meeting facility was an essential service by itself. The function of a <br />solid waste facility, along with the activities that go along with it that are not being adequately met now, is a <br />combination of the two that makes it an essential public facility. <br />Diana lUlcDuffee said she thinks you do need meeting space in that part of the County. Her current voting <br />precinct is at Homestead Center and it is very inadequate. She hopes it can be used as a precinct. However, <br />what she sees most. attractive is running it down Rogers Road instead of down Eubanks Road. The neighbors of <br />the landfill w anted water and sewer. <br />Paul Spier, with the Orange County Solid waste Division, stated that it would have gravity flow into system <br />developed by Chapel Hill when they put their facility on Mill House Road. It will not have a pump station.. <br />John Herrera stated that Carrboro just annexed all those neighbors in that area. He stated that he feels the <br />County will have a stronger case for sewer if the sewer was offered to the Rogers Road neighborhood. <br />Sally Cneene asked tivhat functions are currently not being well served. <br />Moses Carey said the educational functions associated with solid waste management operations are not being <br />served. The municipal staffs and county staff could use the facility to conduct activities that cannot be done at <br />the current site. <br />