Orange County NC Website
Mark Chilton stated that with lower income housing, it is not the best policy to set people up with septic <br />systems because they call for $10,000 to be rebuilt down the road and there is no way for a family to afford that <br />20 or 30 years down the road. The risks are not there with a sewer system with the infrastructure costs spread <br />across a lot of different customers. Building housing in rural areas that are five to fifteen miles away from <br />shopping and employment is not good environmental planning. In addition to transferring development rights <br />into the municipalities, he suggested transferring dej=elop~nent rights to areas of the County that are served by <br />se«Ter and looking at denser development in those areas. <br />Barry Jacobs suggested that density be moved to areas where services are available. <br />John Herrera stated that he hears from developers that the development process is too long, and suggested that <br />the process be streamlined for developers who wish to provide more than the required amount of affordable <br />housing. What incentives can «~e provide to streamline the process that we have? If it takes longer the <br />consumer pays for it. Who is? We should be looking at ways to set goals to reduce cost so we benefit everyone <br />living in our community. <br />Jacquelyn Gist said that two years ago, Carrboro officials met with homebuilders about policies and procedures <br />that drive up the cost of housing. The number of times that developers have to bring back revised plans along <br />t~~ith taxes increase the cost of housing. She stated that she would like to see the report from the town staff <br />concerning this meeting. <br />Mark Kleinsclunidt said that he hears from developers about the process being so long. There is nothing to <br />excise from the process. They need to take some of the process and remove it from the part that costs money, <br />i.e.. use the concept review process before they pay a lot of money. <br />Diana I~~IcDuffee stated the developers have to keep resubmitting plans because they do not have things r~~orked <br />out, i.e., stormwater, open space, vernacular architectural standards, etc. <br />Jim Ward stated that if there was a way to reduce process costs, it does not mean the consumer will pay less. <br />The market drives the price of the house. <br />Eric Hallman stated that he 1~~ould like to see us focus on the consumer. <br />l~loses Carey stated taxes and fees add to the cost of housing but he is not convinced it is the problem. <br />Sally Green asked how vernacular architectural standards translate to affordable housing. <br />telex Zaffron said the primary purpose of the vernacular architectural standards is to ensure that the affordable <br />housing blends in with market rate houses. <br />John Hen•era stated that the goverlunents need to agree on common goals for affordable housing. <br />Joal Broun stated that all the boards look forward to seeing the Orange County Comprehensive Housing <br />Strategy coming out on Monday. <br />Jim Ward said that a major player is the University and they need to be part of this conversation. He stated that <br />he is delighted to hear from the Chancellor that they are considering an affordable housing project in Carrboro's <br />jurisdiction. He stated that he t~~°ants to work with the university and maximize those opportunities. <br /> <br />