Browse
Search
Minutes - 20050609
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Minutes - 20050609
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 2:39:47 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:33:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/9/2005
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-09-2005-
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 06-09-2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
item is not shown as an item for the County Commissioners to address in the local <br />budget. <br />John Link pointed out Attachment 5, Alternative Scenarios for Possible Modifications <br />to the FY 2005-06 Manager's Recommended Budget. This indicates how the County <br />Commissioners can cut the tax increase to less than 3 cents. He does not think there can <br />be no increase, because there are 3 cents of mandates. He recommends looking at cutting <br />the first and second cents. <br />John Link then pointed out Attachment 4, which is the history of the total amount of <br />County appropriations to both school systems since 1990. He said that the real issue is how <br />much the County can afford in terms of increases in appropriations. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that the Board asked John Link to ask both school <br />systems about some specific questions, one of them being middle college. He said that <br />CHCCS is showing middle college expenses of $75,000 and OCS is showing middle college <br />expenses (support staff, technology, transportation) of $125,000. He asked if there was a <br />clear understanding of what bath school systems need. John Link could not answer this. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that he does not feel comfortable in making a decision if <br />he does not have a good answer about the discrepancy in the middle college area and other <br />areas. <br />• OCS Superintendent and Board of Education Presentation <br />OCS Board Chair Libbie Hough thanked the County Commissioners. She said that <br />over the past two years, the board of education has partnered with the community to <br />generate roadmaps for improvement to the school system. These opportunities have <br />yielded valuable information. Their 2005-06 budget request comes directly from these <br />community-generated plans -The five-year strategic plan, middle school task force <br />recommendations, and preliminary work from a high school reform task force. They <br />consider it critically important that the students' needs have been substantiated by the <br />funding of the Board of County Commissioners' commissioned Educational Excellence Work <br />Group. This report validates that the OCS is doing an excellent job helping students at the <br />elementary level. It also clearly points out what must be done to help the middle and high <br />school students thrive. The OCS board endorsed the budget request unanimously. The <br />four major categories of the budget request are literacy support, dropout prevention, <br />increasing academic rigor, and recruitment and retention of excellent teachers. At the last <br />board meeting, they looked at areas that may need to take priority over others if they do not <br />receive more than the $95 per pupil increase. They have not gone through each line item, <br />but have focused an some major initiatives. They have concerns about continuing or <br />moving forward with adequate funding to bring all middle schools up to a consistent level of <br />service, collaboration efforts with CHCCS, and addressing the dropout rate. The OCS <br />board also stated concerns about the proposed tiered funding approach. She said that the <br />tiered approach promises to address any difference in funding if there is any money left <br />over. The OCS board encourages the Board of County Commissioners to respect the fact <br />that school boards have been given the statutory authority to choose programming that is <br />best for their students. Rather than having the County Commissioners earmark funds for <br />purposes in both districts, they wish to retain their authority to determine the use of funds. <br />Last year, they were encouraged to use their fund balance to cover recurring expenses. <br />They used $1.4 million of the fund balance to implement programs and services last year, <br />many of which have been on the budget requests for well over five years. They need the <br />County Commissioners' help to ensure that current programming and services can continue. <br />In closing, she said that the OCS Board of Education would like to state that, no matter the <br />individual position on taxes, they all think that students of rural Orange County deserve the <br />best education possible and they need the County Commissioners' support to provide this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.