Browse
Search
Minutes - 20050526
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Minutes - 20050526
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 2:43:45 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:32:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/26/2005
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-26-2005-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 05-26-2005
Agenda - 05-26-2005-2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 05-26-2005
Agenda - 05-26-2005-3
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 05-26-2005
Agenda - 05-26-2005-4
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 05-26-2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Across the Nation <br />Due to state and federal funding cuts and implementation of unfunded mandates, a <br />number of local governments have had to become "creative" in funding services <br />. They have became dependent an one-time budget "fixes" such as borrowing from <br />unspent capital projects, freezing and delaying hiring, and using fund balance to try to <br />keep tax increases low <br />. Most have tapped all of their non-recurring funding sources <br />. True far Orange County as well <br />To that end, analysts predict that the majority of State and local governments will face <br />a budget gap as they begin planning for fiscal year 2005-06 <br />County's Revenue Highlights <br />Revaluation -Appreciation of Property Values <br />^ Factors affecting real property appreciation include location, size and nature of <br />property use <br />. If property owner experienced valuation change that fell below the countywide average <br />percentage and if the tax rate remained at the effective tax rate, would probably <br />experience a decrease in property taxes <br />. If, on other hand, the change increased the value above the average, owner would <br />probably experience an increase in property taxes <br />Property Tax Base <br />^ Overall property tax base approaching $12 billion <br />^ Compared to $10 billion base used to plan 2004-05 budget <br />^ Reflects estimated growth rate of about 19°!° <br />^ Average increase in non-Revaluation years between 3.5 to 4% <br />Proposed General Fund Tax Rate <br />Recommended tax rate of 86.8 cents per $100 of assessed valuation <br />. Represents an increase of nine cents over the equivalent "revenue neutral" post- <br />revaluation tax rate of 77.8 cents <br />One cent on property tax estimated to generate $1,187,580 <br />Property Tax Revenues Continue to Be Strong -chart <br />Other Revenue Highlights <br />Revenues such as sales tax reimbursements and investment earnings have slowed or <br />decreased over last few years <br />Intergovernmental revenues for next year increase by about $1.4 million <br />. 11 °I° increase tied mainly to Department of Social Services <br />. Offsets expenditure increases such as <br />. Daycare services <br />. Social Worker positions added during the current fiscal year <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.