Browse
Search
Minutes - 20050523
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Minutes - 20050523
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 2:44:35 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:31:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/2005
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-23-2005-c1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 05-23-2005
Agenda - 05-23-2005-d1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 05-23-2005
Agenda - 05-23-2005-d2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 05-23-2005
Agenda - 05-23-2005-d3
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 05-23-2005
Agenda - 05-23-2005-w1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 05-23-2005
Agenda - 05-23-2005-w2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 05-23-2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Craig Benedict gave the PowerPoint presentation. <br />Item D2 -Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Update <br />1. Research <br />2. Prior goad work <br />- Rural Character Study <br />- Shaping Orange County's Future <br />- Water Resources Report <br />- Other <br />3. Advisory board perspective and public <br />- Advisory board reps and focus groups 2002 <br />- Public outreach 2004 & 2005 <br />- Full advisory boards 2005 <br />Ideas and recommendations <br />- 13 Growth management challenges <br />- Staff's ideas and options <br />Big questions <br />- Limited resources. Limit growth? <br />- Haw much growth can Orange County sustain? <br />- So we limit long-range build-out by lowering density? Or... <br />- Do we rest with existing and trended growth patterns by accommodating development? <br />- Should the minimum lot size in rural areas be more than 40,000 sf for single-family <br />without encroachment an critical private septic and well facilities?Outreach: Issues and <br />Responses <br />6a. Lower Density -Sprawl - VMT <br />Gb. Lower Density -Land Value <br />6c. Downzone - Upzone <br />6d. 2 acre Minimum Lot Size -New? <br />6e. Do people want larger lots? <br />6f. Larger lot cost? <br />6g. Lower density -Reduced Housing Options? <br />6h. Strict Land Use -Pushes Growth? <br />6i. Economic Development <br />7. Land Use Element outline/other elements <br />- Review and recommendations process <br />- Planning Board role <br />- Timeframe <br />- Next steps <br />Background Information Collected and Presented During Township Meetings <br />Addressed: <br />- Sustainability <br />- Population <br />- Environment -Air, Water, & Habitat <br />- Rural Character <br />- Sprawl <br />- Economy -Including Farm Economy <br />Comprehensive Plan Land Use Committee ~CPLUC) <br />13 Growth Management Challenges <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.