Minutes - 20050517 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Metadata

Thumbnails

Annotations

elsewhere and have been involved. But when a development is proposed in any existing neighborhood, the Council has long encouraged a meaningful interchange between the developer and those immediately affected by the proposed development." This is consistent with Paragraph 3 of the Orange County development plan. Habitat must involve the surrounding community of the development process. Until this occurs, dates will continue to slip, costs will continue to go up, and the Town, County, State, and Federal money will be at risk. The Coalition feels that no decision should be made to the development agreement until a committee or subcommittee of Board members has an opportunity to meet with members of the surrounding community. Alan Lucier lives on Oak Hill Road, which runs off of Sunrise Road. He made reference to his handout. The first page is a summary of the concerns of the neighbors. In brief, a high- density project proposed in aloes-density neighborhood on a site with wetlands, steep slopes, noise issues, and traffic issues does not make sense. He said that they needed the County Commissioners' help to get this project back on track. The second page is the petition that the neighbors signed opposing the concept plan that Habitat submitted to the Town of Chapel Hill. He provided the Clerk with the signatures. He said that the neighbors do not feel that they have been involved and they object to the plan because it does not make sense on this environmentally sensitive site, which is in the headwaters of Jordan Lake. The last page of the handout is page one of the development agreement that the County Commissioners have been asked to modify. He made reference to two critical statements -one in which Habitat expresses intent to build single-family dwellings on this site and the second in which Habitat agrees to construct 25 dwelling units. The modification indicates duplexes, triplexes, and 50 units on the same property. The statements are as follows: "Whereas, Habitat intends to construct single family dwelling units available to first-time homebuyers earning up to 80°~ of HUD area median income; and Whereas, Habitat agrees to utilize the funds provided by the County for the purpose of acquiring Property for the purpose of constructing 25 dwelling units..." He asked the Board of County Commissioners to defer action on this request and dig into the issues. Commissioner Halkiotis pointed out that Susan Levy, Executive Director of Habitat for Humanity, was in the audience. He asked about the experience of Habitat with duplexes and triplexes and how the maintenance is handled. Susan Levy said that in Orange County they have not yet built duplexes and triplexes. Part of the plan was to work collaboratively with Orange Community Housing, who has built town homes. The ownership is typically under a homeowner's association that handles the maintenance. Commissioner Jacobs asked Susan Levy to provide a cost breakdown of the development. Susan Levy said that the engineering has not been done at this stage. She could only give a broad estimate. Commissioner Gordan asked how this development plan got from single-family to multi- family. Housing and Community Development Director Tara Fikes said that the 25 units in the development agreement are tied to the actual County dollars that were provided to Habitat for the purchase of this property. The funds were tied to the 25 single-family units. Commissioner Gordon asked who would be responsible for the other units. Tara Fikes said that this is Habitat's determination. Geof Gledhill said that this agreement does not require these single-family dwelling units to be detached. He will look at this further with Tara Fikes. Commissioner Jacobs asked about the County's policy regarding the transparency of non-profits to which the County provides funding. Tara Fikes said that at this time the agreements do not require that any documents be made available to the public. Certain documents must be made available to the County, such as the annual audit. Commissioner Jacobs pointed out that this makes the documents public since it would be made available to the County.