Orange County NC Website
Call to Order and Introductions <br />1. Discussion of Common Issues (written documents provided where necessary) <br />A. OWASA Issues <br />1) Update on Hunting on OWASA-owned Lands and Wildlife Resources <br />Commission Current Position <br />Pat Davis was representing OWASA and was available to answer questions. <br />Environment and Resource Conservation Director Dave Stancil made reference to a <br />letter from Chair Carey to the Chair of the OWASA board related to this item that was <br />transmitted within the last few days. He made reference to Attachment 1-A-1a and said that this <br />is a comprehensive topic that has 25 years of history behind it. It dates all the way back to <br />1980, when the permitting for the Cane Creek Reservoir was underway. The permit <br />requirements included some provisions to address the mitigation for wildlife habitat that needed <br />to be created when the Cane Creek Reservoir became filled to offset the land resources that <br />were taken away by the flooding of the lake. The OWASA board is meeting tonight to talk about <br />this topic. <br />He made reference to the memo dated April 22"d from Ed Kerwin, which provides some <br />history. One of the things that is not in the memo is that, in 2002 and 2003, the <br />Intergovernmental Parks Work Group did a report on the OWASA Mitigation Tract to look at the <br />possibilities far low-impact recreation or other recreational opportunities. The OWASA <br />Mitigation Tract is a 500-acre parcel of land located off Buckhorn Road and is a few miles north <br />of the Cane Creek Reservoir in Bingham Township. At that time, the staff became aware of <br />some possible need to revisit same of the original permitting requirement related to the <br />compatibility between the hunting provisions and the possibility of public recreation activities. <br />In September 2004, the OWASA board discussed a proposal to allow limited permit <br />controlled deer hunting on the mitigation tract. Initially, there appeared to be concurrence of <br />limited deer hunting and the possibility of conjunctive low-impact recreation use. In February of <br />this year, a public meeting was held, and on April 8t", the Wildlife Resources Commission <br />Executive Director sent a letter to OWASA stating that the commission was no longer satisfied <br />that OWASA had met the mitigation provisions for the permit dating back to 1980, and that they <br />intended to initiate hunting programs on the mitigation tract and the Cane Creek Reservoir in the <br />fall of 2005. There have been subsequent discussions since this April 10t" memorandum <br />between OWASA staff and the Wildlife Resources Commission. The issue facing OWASA now <br />is whether or not and to what degree to allow hunting provisions on the mitigation tract or the <br />reservoir itself. <br />Jacquelyn Gist said that she appreciated the letter from the Board of County <br />Commissioners and she agrees with this letter, in that the idea of people hunting while people <br />are out hiking is a bad idea. She asked if opening up the lands for low impact recreation would <br />satisfy the State. Dave Stancil said that he believed that it would not satisfy the State because <br />the WRC is saying that some provision for hunting needs to be made. <br />Mayor Foy asked why this is taming up now. Pat Davis said that back in 1980 when the <br />404 permit was issued by the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers for the Cane Creek Reservoir <br />project, it did include provisions for allowing hunting on the reservoir and it also required the <br />implementation of other wildlife habitat mitigation measures. One approach that was agreed to <br />was that OWASA would purchase 500 acres of land in the northern part of the watershed and <br />set it aside in perpetuity as wildlife habitat. The conditions of approval far the project included <br />that there would be hunting allowed on the mitigation tract. When the permit was accepted, the <br />Board of Directors approved a resolution that confirmed the conditions of the permit. OWASA <br />did not aggressively pursue following through on allowing hunting on the mitigation lands or on <br />