Browse
Search
Minutes - 20050428
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Minutes - 20050428
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 2:48:07 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:31:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/28/2005
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-28-2005-
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 04-28-2005
Agenda - 04-28-2005-1a1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 04-28-2005
Agenda - 04-28-2005-1a2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 04-28-2005
Agenda - 04-28-2005-1b1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 04-28-2005
Agenda - 04-28-2005-1b2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 04-28-2005
Agenda - 04-28-2005-1c2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 04-28-2005
Agenda - 04-28-2005-2a1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 04-28-2005
Agenda - 04-28-2005-2a3
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 04-28-2005
Agenda - 04-28-2005-2a4
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 04-28-2005
Agenda - 04-28-2005-2c1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 04-28-2005
Agenda - 04-28-2005-2c2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 04-28-2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with the staff a certain scope of improvements were agreed upon and the school system staff <br />had agreed to thane improvements. He does not knave the cast implications far the County. <br />CHCCS Board member Lisa Stuckey said that she recalled that the amount was <br />$350,000 with a possibility of another $250,000 that the school system would bear. <br />Alex Zaffran said that the school system staff, in consultation with DOT, will arrive at an <br />understanding of what improvements need to be made and the scope and design of the <br />improvements to serve the school. These improvements would be on the school system's <br />schedule, and then DOT would follow behind on their schedule. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that it sounds like the Moving Ahead money is not going to <br />be totally consumed by the Homestead Raad project. He suggested that whatever is left over <br />be used for the road improvements for the high school and to communicate this to DOT. <br />Chair Carey agreed and suggested that the staffs coordinate the letters to write to DOT. <br />Jim Ward made reference to the wording regarding Homestead Raad and asked that it <br />say that the project will "fully fund" the improvements that have been identified so that the <br />project is not short of funding at a later date. He would like to keep the pressure an DOT, <br />because they did not rule out the passibility of any 2005 construction. He hopes that all letters <br />will reflect this. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she thinks it should be clear that everyone wants to fully <br />fund and complete the Homestead Road project. <br />Alex Zaffran said that he recalls that Doug Galyan ,North Carolina Board of <br />Transportation member, was amenable to keeping any leftover money in Orange County, but he <br />could not guarantee it. <br />The staffs will generate letters to DOT. <br />Commissioner Gordan suggested copying the letter along with athank-you note to <br />Senator Ellie Kinnaird, Representative Verla Insko, Doug Galyan, and Mike Mills from NCDOT. <br />They were present at the meeting in Raleigh and it was helpful to have them there. <br />3) Priority Projects <br />Mayor Fay said that Chapel Hill has a priority project that will affect Carrboro, which is <br />the signal system. Chapel Hill wants to replace its signal system because it has had trouble <br />maintaining it. The rationale for making it the highest priority is that they think it will help traffic <br />flow better and they can avoid investments in wider roads. The signal system needs to be <br />replaced with a fiber optic system. Chapel Hill has asked DOT for the money for this. Chapel <br />Hill, Carrboro, and part of Durham are served by this signal system. He said that their highest <br />priority in the last four years has been South Columbia Street, which has been pushed back. <br />They are concerned about the Transportation Improvement Plan because they have developed <br />plans and worked on them and they feel like they are spinning their wheels. They are beginning <br />to get frustrated. <br />Jacquelyn Gist asked that Chapel Hill keep in mind walkability with the signal system. <br />The signal system now is not pedestrian-friendly. <br />Mayor Foy said that the Chapel Hill Traffic Engineer has to drive the roads and record <br />the synchronization. There is no sophisticated way to test the synchronization at this time. <br />They would like to have some software to be able to monitor the system from a central location. <br />Joal Hall Broun said that, as they go through problems with DOT, all elected officials <br />need to think about where to place some pressure points such as using the legislators. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to some information published recently about <br />how the Triangle has overspent its transportation money and that it owed money. This is <br />referring to Division 5, which is Durham County and east. Division 7 is Orange County and <br />west, and it is owed some money. She thinks the staff has looked into it to see how Orange <br />County has fared. In the scheme of things, Orange County has not received a lot of money. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.