Minutes - 20050426 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Recommendations for Increasing OCS Resources Pre Kindergarten -12t"Grade 1. Increased Provision of Social Workers 2. Increased Resources for Exceptional Children {EC) Specialists in OCS 3. Improved Transportation for After-School Programs for OCS 4. District Resources for Grants and Data 5. Subject Area Specialists (Curriculum Alignment, Development, Implementation) 6. Increased Resources for Pre-School Services Chair Carey said that the Board of County Commissioners has not adapted any one of these tiers yet. The County Commissioners just gat it last week and they wanted the school board's initial reactions to this funding concept. AI Hartkopf said that last night someone asked Dr. Grumet about the recommendations and if they were in priority order, and Dr. Grumet indicated that they were not. He wanted to point this out. He made reference to the second to the last slide, and the third bullet. He asked for elaboration on this (As an alternative, NC Statutes permit school appropriations by purpose, function, or project). John Link said that is the process decided by State statute. He was describing something that would involve all three parties in the agreement. AI Hartkopf asked if it still has to be a per pupil allocation and that you cannot block one system and not the other. Jahn Link said that the per pupil has to be the same. AI Hartkopf said that this does not do very much for equity. Lisa Stuckey made reference to tier III and asked if this is suggesting that ad valorem property taxes be raised and that the CHCCS district tax be lowered to provide additional funds to OCS. She asked if funding for CHCCS would remain the same, assuming there are no other changes to tier I and tier II. John Link said yes and that in order for that to happen, there would have to be actual agreement in writing. Lisa Stuckey said that it seems to her that if there were an additional infusion of funds to the OCS, she does not think the CHCCS Board would be interested in directing how the funds would be spent. John Link said that they could be two separate agreements or just one agreement between Orange County and the OCS. John Link said that this tracks back to the discussion of the definition of equity. Commissioner Halkiotis said that this is one of the reasons why he asked staff to go somewhere and develop these ideas to achieve equity and to have the attorney to get all legal questions answered. He does not understand why these questions cannot be answered once and for all. The second issue is that OCS will not need anything for 1 Q years out with respect to large buildings. He said that they need to start looking at the real needs because County government has been giving its needs away. He thinks that a culture should be developed of who really needs what. Commissioner Jacobs passed around the County Facility Needs notebook far the school boards to review. Chair Carey said that the County would provide the school boards with a copy of this notebook because everyone needs to understand that Orange County has a lot of pent up needs that have to be addressed. Chair Carey said that there are a lot of different scenarios and the County Commissioners would like to hear from others. Elizabeth Brown said that it seems that when they had merger discussions, the main oppositions were against busing in the CHCCS and the desire for local control in the northern district. She understands equity to mean fairness and equality. If the major issues are busing and local control, then she thinks that equity would mean equal funding and not programmatic equity.