Orange County NC Website
The staff has begun a preliminary analysis, and once they reach a certain point, it <br />will be brought to the SWAB far discussion. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked why the SWAB's recommendation has not been taken <br />to the other jurisdictions for approval. She does not think there should be a separate <br />group. Gayle Wilson said that there were strong expressions of interest of participation <br />in a process to make sure that some municipalities' concerns are adequately <br />addressed. <br />Chair Carey would like to know what the SWAB thinks about this. <br />B. J. Tipton said that one thought was to have some dialogue between the <br />jurisdictions and professional staff so that there is same buy in before the stakeholders <br />have to decide. <br />Jan Sassaman said that the SWAB members are representatives and they do the <br />best for those wham they represent. If they get more active representation from elected <br />officials, then there can be a buy in at the planning process and it would go a lot <br />smoother. With regard to Gayle Wilson's proposal, he thinks there should be more <br />involvement of the SWAB. He suggested having two SWAB members on the work <br />group so that there would be an equal weighting. He said that for this to work, the <br />representatives ofthe municipalities must be elected officials and not just two citizens. <br />He said that the SWAB members have been educating themselves an these issues for <br />years and some of them are professionals in the area of solid waste. <br />Commissioner Jacobs suggested that the SWAB have a meeting and invite two <br />elected officials from each elected body. Anew group would not have to be formed for <br />this. <br />Chair Carey said that there could still be a process for stakeholders to have input. <br />Commissioner Jacobs suggested using the Assembly of Governments meeting to <br />get this started. <br />John Link said that the intersect between the interlocal agreement and the three- <br />yearplan talks about how to increase the percentage of recyclables that are diverted. <br />He asked if this gets to the point of discussing a Material Recycling Facility (MRF}. He <br />thinks it would be a good idea to refresh us collectively as jurisdictions as to what the <br />interlocal agreement says and where it stops and where the three-year plan begins. <br />Gayle Wilson and Jan Sassaman agreed. <br />Jan Sassaman said that the focus of Chapel Hill's plan was that it continued to call <br />far 61 % recycling, but did not state a means to achieve this. He said that Chapel Hill <br />wants to keep the options open for a pay as you throw system, and the SWAB has a <br />problem with this system if it is implemented by only one jurisdiction. <br />Commissioner Jacobs painted out that April 28th is the Assembly of Governments <br />meeting. <br />Randy Kabrick said that he would not like to take them away from the process that <br />has already been set up. He agreed with adding some elected officials. <br />Bonnie Norwood said that she believes it would be easier to bring elected officials <br />into their group to educate them. <br />