Orange County NC Website
package. The total of the four bond referenda was about $212 million, with the schools getting <br />about $168 million and the County getting $44 million. Those would include, not only new <br />construction projects, but also renovation projects for both the schools and the County. <br />Regarding alternative financing, the County has been able to borrow $206 million. This <br />has also funded new construction projects and renovation projects for both the County and the <br />schools. <br />Pay as you ga money totals about $64.7 million -that's the sales tax and the dedicated <br />property tax after the debt service. <br />She said that they have worked to try to identify some projects that have been identified <br />and either partially funded, fully funded, or getting no funding at all. The first three projects are <br />the school projects that were included in the 2004-2014 CIP. This left Elementary School #10, <br />which would cost $12.8 million in alternative financing that is in the recent debt issuance <br />schedule that the Board saw in October. The next two projects far Chapel Hill-Carrboro City <br />Schools -Elementary School #11 and Middle School #5 -were identified and with the SAPFO <br />numbers from last year, with the student projection numbers, those were seen on the last few <br />years of the capital investment plan. There is no funding identified far those, and as the student <br />membership numbers are updated this year, it will show those came out in what is planned for <br />the next ten years. <br />County projects that have identified needs include affordable housing. There is $2.7 <br />million identified in the CIP. It is funded, and that is the 2001 bands that will be issued between <br />2004 and 2014. The Board has also heard a need for an animal shelter. It is partially funded in <br />the County's ten-year CIP - $425,000 is identified in pay as you go revenue, and that would do <br />only the design work. That does not include any construction. There is also a need far <br />Blackwood Farm preservation. It is partially funded at $75,000. This is only to stabilize the <br />current buildings that are at the facility. <br />Regarding future County space and storage needs -there's $11. 7 million in alternative <br />financing and pay as you go money in the ten-year CIP. There is no specific project identified <br />for this money, but the money has been reserved. <br />The Heritage Center was identified in the CIP as partially funded at $112,000. There is <br />no additional money. <br />There is a need far land banking of future school sites, but there is na money allocated. <br />Library services far the central part of the County, for Carrboro, and for Cheeks were <br />also identified in the Library Task Force Report, but there is na money identified for this. <br />The Triangle Spartsplex is partially funded and there will be another update in <br />December. <br />Twin Creeks Park -the 2001 bond included money for only phase I of that park and <br />does not include anything beyond that. There is $975,000 allocated from the Soccer Superfund <br />for West Ten Soccer Complex, but there is na money to build this site out. <br />There are cost overruns associated with High School #3 and are somewhere between <br />$3-4 million. These are just estimates. There are also cast overruns for Middle School #3 of <br />between $2.5-3 million. There are also cost overruns far the Southern Orange Senior Center of <br />$800,000-$1.2 million. <br />Chair Jacobs reiterated that they are trying to look at the budget -capital and operating <br />- in a sustainable manner in a climate where the revenues have decreased. They are also <br />looking at dealing with changes in particularly capital spending. He said that the County has <br />almost caught up to the school building needs and the SAPFO has also changed in that it is a <br />legal commitment to provide schools as needed in a timely manner. <br />He said that he has been raising this topic far almost a year of the difference in the <br />capital plans of the schools and County government. He said that this is just aten-year model. <br />He has no problem referring this to the school boards far comments. He thinks this is timely <br />because the County needs to have a target. <br />