Orange County NC Website
Patrick McDonough said that when Triangle Transit got the pie chart from Chapel Hill <br /> Transit this morning, he heard something different in their meetings than did Chapel Hill. He <br /> said that the governmental entities are better at prioritizing their own needs than prioritizing <br /> shared needs, due to limited resources. This is where the public input will help. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz said that this is a markef justified plan and the priorities should <br /> be more time hours to regional groups. He said that 25% to Saturdays and Sundays is <br /> excessive. <br /> Commissioner McKee said that most of these hours are going to be dedicated to <br /> Chapel Hill and Carrboro, but there is a growing need for transit in rural Orange County. He <br /> said that he does not want to be constrained by artificially early timelines and deadlines and not <br /> make the right decisions. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that he agreed with Commissioner McKee but he does <br /> think that this pie chart has proportionality. He thinks that there needs to be proportionality <br /> between Triangle Transit funding, Chapel Hill Transit funding, and Orange Public Transit <br /> funding. <br /> Chair Pelissier said that she does not want to pick specific routes, but that is up to the <br /> transit entities. <br /> Frank Clifton suggested that the Board take a consensus on the direction the County <br /> Commissioners are going to give the staff. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Hemminger <br /> to state that the preference for guidelines was based on the percentage thaf was set forth in the <br /> original bus hours as articulated in the chart that we have in the agenda materials, and that <br /> specific bus routes will be up to the providers. The Board will listen to the public as it makes it <br /> preferences known regarding which routes it wants various providers to prioritize. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz said that when they look at proportionality for the bus route <br /> scenario, it could be that a large percentage of the hours are in the bottom half of the prioritized <br /> route. He would not want to see some higher priority routes to be lost from certain providers <br /> because they are in the smaller percentage of overall hours. He wants to give way to the <br /> priority in the original list. <br /> Craig Benedict said that the pie chart from Chapel Hill Transit has all 6,000 hours of <br /> supporting the existing services under their piece of the pie. <br /> Discussion ensued about the proportion of bus hours. <br /> Chair Pelissier recapped the motion, which was to ask staff to come up with a draft bus <br /> plan that follows the proportionality that was used last year in looking at the bus hours. Each <br /> provider will select their priority routes. <br /> However, Craig Benedict said that the numbers are different from the 64%, 24%, and <br /> 12% in our agenda materials. In spring of 2011, according to his calculations, the numbers <br /> were Chapel Hill Transit—43.95%, Triangle Transit—31.46%, and the remainder was OPT <br /> (roughly 24%). <br /> Commissioner Hemminger said that her second was based on the numbers on the pie <br /> chart, which has 64% for Chapel Hill Transit, 24% for Triangle Transit, and 12% for OPT. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that the pie chart was generated by Chapel Hill Transit and <br /> the ones from Craig Benedict were from last year. <br /> Patrick McDonough said that this discussion is demonstrative of different visions that <br /> different staff inembers have had over time. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that she wanted to keep the pie chart percentages of 64, <br /> 24, and 12. <br />