Minutes - 20041007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

recently, they have been looking at water quality issues. He thinks there has to be a move to being mare oriented toward storm water management. Chair Jacobs asked about calculations on average lot size, excluding ten-acre lots. Craig Benedict said that lot sizes are averaging 2.5 acres. The soils in portions of the County are not good for septic systems, which is why those areas are less dense. Commissioner Brawn made reference to the original goals and the idea of air quality, traffic, groundwater, watershed protection and the cast of supplying services. She said that on the other side, we are taking the Neuse River and not using the State's highest recommendations, but using this mixture. She said that these recommendations are probably the absolute minimum for watershed protection. She asked if both could be done. She said that it seemed that the staff was using the comments from the public meetings to make the determination to modify these goals. She does not think there is a balance because there are too many people in the County that want protection. She thinks this is a very significant modification from the comments of these very small groups of people. John Link said that he encouraged Craig Benedict to provide the options and it is not entirely based on the public meetings. Commissioner Brown said that many of the people that attend the meetings have no understanding of what the issues are. The public education piece is very important. She said that a few people in the County {developers and a few property owners} are very opposed to zoning or land use planning, and they tend to drum up some very erroneous understandings about haw this might impact them, and they are the ones that come to the meetings. She will stand for the people in the County that are very concerned about the water quality. Many of these people will never come to public meetings. Commissioner Gordon said that she does not think that the Board ever confirmed the goals. She also could not figure out which set of goals in the packet the Commissioners were to supposed to reconfirm. She asked for mare clarity and thoroughness. She would like to see the goals and the objectives of the goals written out in full sentences. She would like to see a document that states all of the goals, including the ones from the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Committee (CPLUC}. If goals have been deleted, she would like to know why. She made reference to page nine and suggested saying "water resources protection" rather than "watershed protection", because watershed does not bring up the issue of groundwater. She asked that a list of all the goals and an explanation of any deletions be prepared by staff and brought back to the Commissioners for approval. She said that she is not ready to go forward with this.