Browse
Search
Minutes - 20040823
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Minutes - 20040823
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 3:12:51 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:24:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/23/2004
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 08-23-2004-C
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 08-23-2004
Agenda - 08-23-2004-D
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 08-23-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(al Density <br />If housing density is reduced in Orange County rural areas, where does new development go? <br />(h} Rural Areas <br />over 5,000 pre-existing lots under two acres <br />over 5,000 mobile home lots <br />over 50,000 lots could still be created under staff proposals <br />Why is a two-acre minimum lot size necessary? <br />1. A large lot is more sustainable because it offers more flexibility to achieve typical single <br />family structures and activities and reduces the likelihood of encroachment upon <br />environmentally sensitive lands and onsite well and septic systems. <br />2. The USGS Water Resource report of 1996 suggested atwo-acre minimum lot size sa <br />each developed lot would provide a roughly equivalent groundwater recharge area. <br />3. The two-acre lot will provide an `in-lot' area for open space under the stewardship of the <br />owner. Other open space may be protected by the HOA and in combination, <br />development will have a less `stripped out' pattern and more rural character by virtue of <br />the preservation. <br />(i) Lowering Density <br />Down-zoning <br />Less lot potential <br />(1) Does it lower the value of land? <br />No. Land sales in per-acre value in lowered density areas such as Cane Creek Watershed <br />went up 200% vs. less restricted areas of Bingham Township, which went up 46% in the same <br />time period. <br />Land value relates to acreage in many cases and not how many lots can be built in rural areas. <br />(2) Does it take away land equity for our retirement? <br />The staff proposal of lowered density in most cases is trying to reflect historical densities, which <br />are based on soil limitations. <br />Lowering densities are based on generalized watershed areas and soil changes can be <br />localized. Property owners may retain their development right equity (for TDR purposes) if they <br />can show mare units than regulations allow. <br />(3) If housing density is reduced in Orange County rural areas, where does new <br />development go? <br />Urban Areas <br />- Additional lots could be created in urban transition areas through rezoning <br />- Municipalities will consider new urban growth under their planning goals <br />- Other counties may want growth <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.