|
22
<br />B. Zoning Districts with Maximum Density of 1 Dwelling Unit per 2 Acres
<br />Table 131. Minimum lot required for private road subdivision nrovirlinn nt haast *Igoi nncn o.,
<br />The seventeen divisions in the preceding chart would be cumbersome to use. The following
<br />chart simplifies the sliding scale into four increments for minimum lot size according to
<br />percentage of preserved open space.
<br />Lot size is decreased by
<br />Area is
<br />The effective
<br />increments of 5,124.71 sq. ft.
<br />based on a
<br />density or
<br />and rounded to nearest whole
<br />12 -lot
<br />number of acres
<br />number. 5,124.71 sq. ft. is the
<br />subdivision
<br />per each
<br />difference between 3 acres
<br />(max.
<br />buildable lot is
<br />(max. lot size) and 1 acre (min.
<br />number of
<br />calculated by
<br />lot size) divided by the number of
<br />lots
<br />dividing the total
<br />integral increments between
<br />permitted
<br />acreage in the
<br />33% and 50%
<br />with a
<br />subdivision by
<br />private
<br />the number of
<br />road).
<br />units allowed.
<br />A.
<br />B
<br />C
<br />D
<br />E
<br />F
<br />Starting with X = 130,680 sq. ft.
<br />at 33% open space,
<br />C = 12 * B
<br />D = A *E
<br />E = C/(1 -A)
<br />F = (E/12)
<br />B = X minus
<br />/43,560 sq.ft
<br />(130,680 sq.ft.- 42,560 sq.ft.)
<br />/(50 -33)
<br />%
<br />Min. lot size
<br />Lots
<br />Open
<br />Total sq. ft.
<br />Acres /DU
<br />open
<br />(sq. ft.)
<br />(sq. ft).
<br />space
<br />space
<br />(sq. ft.)
<br />0.33
<br />130,680
<br />1,568,160
<br />772,377
<br />2,340,537
<br />4.5
<br />0.341
<br />125,555
<br />1,506,664
<br />776,160
<br />2,282,824
<br />4.4
<br />0.351
<br />120,431
<br />1,445,167
<br />778,167
<br />2,223,334
<br />4.3
<br />0.36
<br />115,306
<br />1,383,671
<br />778,315
<br />2,161,985
<br />4.1
<br />0.37
<br />110,181
<br />1,322,174
<br />776,515
<br />2,098,689
<br />4.0
<br />0.38
<br />105,056
<br />1,260,678
<br />772,673
<br />2,033,351
<br />3.9
<br />0.39
<br />99,932
<br />1,199,181
<br />766,690
<br />1, 965, 871
<br />3.8
<br />0.40
<br />94,807
<br />1,137,685
<br />758,456
<br />1,896,141
<br />3.6
<br />0.41
<br />89,682
<br />1,076,188
<br />747,860
<br />1,824,048
<br />3.5
<br />0.42
<br />84,558
<br />1,014,692
<br />734,777
<br />1,749,469
<br />3.3
<br />0.43
<br />79,433
<br />953,195
<br />719,077
<br />1,672,272
<br />3.2
<br />0.44
<br />74,308
<br />891,699
<br />700,621
<br />1,592,319
<br />3.0
<br />0.45
<br />69,184
<br />830,202
<br />679,256
<br />1,509,459
<br />2.9
<br />0.46
<br />64,059
<br />768,706
<br />654,824
<br />1,423,529
<br />2.7
<br />0.47
<br />58,934
<br />707,209
<br />627,148
<br />1,334,357
<br />2.6
<br />0:48
<br />53,809.
<br />645,713
<br />596,043
<br />1,241,756
<br />2.4
<br />0.49
<br />48,685
<br />584,216
<br />561,306
<br />1,145,522
<br />2.2
<br />0.50
<br />43,5601
<br />522,7201
<br />522,720
<br />1,045,4401
<br />2.0
<br />The seventeen divisions in the preceding chart would be cumbersome to use. The following
<br />chart simplifies the sliding scale into four increments for minimum lot size according to
<br />percentage of preserved open space.
<br />
|