Orange County NC Website
b. Wildlife Resources Commission aquatic fauna inventories. These tend to <br />concentrate on certain watersheds rather than whole counties, but are extremely <br />valuable in evaluating the significance of streams and wetlands. <br />c. Triangle Land Conservancy's Landscape for Wildlife reports. <br />d. Orange County Environment and Resource Conservation Dept. (ERCD), <br />which maintains a comprehensive resource database. <br />e. Eno River State Park and Eno River Association. <br />f. Duke University for information on Duke Forest. <br />2. Revisit approximately 50 existing natural areas. Assessment of the current <br />condition will involve a knowledge of Natural Heritage Program procedures <br />concerning natural areas, plus experience with piedmont biota. Sites could be <br />visited sequentially based on significance rank (state, regional, etc.), but it is more <br />efficient to inventory sites proximal to each other, then move on. At all times when <br />in the field, a given site's file and description will be in hand. Notes, additions, <br />corrections, etc. will be made directly on the paper copy, based on direct <br />observations. Later, these notes will be incorporated into each site's computer file. <br />The most critical data to be gathered are presence /absence of the site's known <br />rare features, and changes to the site's ecological integrity and threat status. New <br />populations of rare species will be reported on standard NCNHP forms. <br />3. Potential new natural areas will be targeted primarily through the use of two <br />remote sensing tools. First, aerial photographs will be used to identify blocks and <br />corridors of natural habitat, as well as to discern natural forest vs. pine plantation. <br />Although size is an important consideration in the selection process, many other <br />factors come into play, such as potential linkage to existing natural areas, and how <br />well buffered a site is from potential disturbances. Second, ERCD forest cover <br />maps will be used to identify forest type. With this information one may generate <br />a list of target rare plants and animals for each site. Other tools that will prove <br />useful are the soils, geology, and topography GIS data layers, available at ERCD. <br />Assessment procedures will parallel those of #2 above, but will concentrate on de <br />novo description of the site. Since Orange County already has completed a <br />comprehensive natural area survey less than fifteen years ago, it is unlikely that a <br />significant number of quality sites were overlooked. For the purposes of this <br />proposal, I estimate that twelve potential sites will be identified, of which perhaps <br />half will make it as natural areas in the updated Inventory document. <br />4. To assess the adequacy of the wildlife corridor system proposed in 1988, it will <br />be necessary to read that section in the Inventory and understand the rationale <br />behind it. The functions of corridors, how species- specific they are, and whether <br />there exists enough natural habitat (and buffer) are some of the parameters to <br />keep in mind when evaluating each corridor. Information that is gathered will be <br />assessed in light of current scientific literature on the subject. <br />