Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Attachment B 009 <br /> Orange County Recommended Criteria Carrboro Board Of Aldermen Comment 3/8/12 Orange County Staff Comments 6-14-12 <br /> Phase 3 <br /> 1.Community Preference Suggests moving to Phase 2."Stakeholder input should be sought Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> early on and gathered while technical research is under way". Phases 1 and 2 are designed for quick analysis(2-3 <br /> weeks per site)and recommendation to the County <br /> Manager and,potentially,the BOCC.Staff sees <br /> benefit in resource efficiency to reject sites that are <br /> not viable candidates due to technical and cost <br /> factors prior to investing substantial time in the <br /> public input process. <br /> A. Input from elected officials Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> B.Alignment with planning Suggest no change Staff recommends moving to Phase 1. <br /> tools(Comprehensive Plan) <br /> C. Input from a broad cross- Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> section of the area to be served <br /> D.Orange County Library Suggest no change Staff recommends removal because the Entity does <br /> Advisory Board not exist. <br /> E.Orange County&Carrboro Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> Friends of the Library <br /> 2.Lease versus Purchase Staff recommends moving to Phase 1. <br /> A.Analysis of the long-term Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> viability of the site <br /> B.Availability of property for Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> lease <br /> Suggests new criteria:"Potential of Lease to Purchase" Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> 3.Partnerships <br /> A.Co-location with other entity Suggests modification to read"Open to public/private co-location" Staff recommends to alter the criteria to read: "Co- <br /> location with other public or private entities" <br /> B. Mutually beneficial joint Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> development <br /> C.Enhances service possibilities Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br />