Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Attachment B 008 <br /> Orange County Recommended Criteria Carrboro Board Of Aldermen Comment 3/8/12 Orange County Staff Comments 6-14-12 <br /> Phase 2 <br /> 1.Centrality Suggests moving entire category to Phase 1 Staff recommends moving to Phase 1. <br /> A. Existing population Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> B.Growth and development Suggest no change. "Fundamental questions of location should be a Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> primary concern.See access comments. Potential growth and Staff agrees with the BOA comment and its <br /> development,as indicated by adopted plans." clarification.Growth and development assumes <br /> "potential"growth and development. Adopted <br /> long range plans would be referred to during the <br /> evaluation process. <br /> C.Proximity to schools Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> D.Proximity to retail Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> E. Proximity to other libraries Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> F.Site is not isolated Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> 2.Site Conditions,Allowances,and Constraints <br /> A.The cost-benefit conclusions Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> of physical,legal,and land-use <br /> allowances/constraints <br /> B.Technical and environmental Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> assessments(planning/zoning, <br /> jurisdictional processes,etc.) <br /> C. Environmentally sustainable Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> (C&A,storm water mgt,buffers, <br /> energy"net zero capacity) <br /> D.Operationally sustainable Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> E. Defeats obsolescence Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> 3.Cost and Availability Suggest wording change to"Terms and Availability" Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> A.Cost for site acquisition Suggests moving to Phase 1."There is no reason to give further Staff recommends that cost remains in Phase 2.The <br /> consideration to a site that is not within budget." site price and budget correlate to overall project <br /> budget.The"raw land"(site)price cannot be <br /> evaluated alone.The other site evaluation variables <br /> in Phases 1 and 2 must be vetted,understood, <br /> assigned risk factors,and priced. <br /> B.Timeframe for development Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> of the site <br /> C.Terms for site control Suggest no change Staff recommends no change from the original. <br /> necessary of development <br /> process <br />