Browse
Search
ORD-2012-020 Proposed UDO Text Amendment: New Section 6.20: Public Sewer Connection
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2010-2019
>
2012
>
ORD-2012-020 Proposed UDO Text Amendment: New Section 6.20: Public Sewer Connection
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2019 3:45:20 PM
Creation date
6/7/2012 3:23:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Minutes 06-05-2012
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Yuhasz to <br /> direct staff to investigate a low-interest loan program to help people that want to hook up to the <br /> Orange County managed sewer systems. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Foushee, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Hemminger to receive the Planning Board's recommendation of approval; close the public <br /> hearing; and Adopt the Ordinance of Approval for the UDO text amendments contained within <br /> Attachment 2, "An Ordinance Amending the Unified Development Ordinance of Orange <br /> County." <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> b. UDO Text Amendment(s)— Rural Economic Development Area Conditional <br /> Zoning District <br /> The Board received the Planning Board recommendation, closed the public hearing, and <br /> considered a decision on a Planning Director initiated Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) <br /> text amendment relating to the creation of the Rural Economic Development Area Conditional <br /> Zoning District (REDA-CZ-1) in the NC Highway 57 Speedway area. <br /> Michael Harvey made reference to the replacement to attachment 2, page 15. There is <br /> an additional amendment to address some concerns. The gray sheet is supposed to replace <br /> pages 15-23 of the packet. He summarized each of the attachments. This item was presented <br /> at the February 27, 2012 Quarterly Public Hearing. This small area plan allows the potential for <br /> additional non-residential activities in areas of the County where there is existing non-residential <br /> land uses. This plan also provides a potential pathway to bring the speedway and the go-cart <br /> track into conformity. These existing uses are non-conforming at this time and cannot be <br /> expanded as they are listed at this time. <br /> Michael Harvey said that concerns were expressed at the QPH by Commissioner <br /> Jacobs and Commissioner McKee regarding the buffers and impacts of the speedway area. <br /> This information was discussed by the Planning Board at length, and this information is <br /> provided in the attachment. He clarified that this Rural Economic Development Area <br /> designation can only be applied in this NC 57 Small Area Plan. He said that he thinks that all of <br /> the concerns have been addressed. <br /> The Planning Board recommended approval of this amendment as long as staff <br /> incorporated the requested changes. He went through the changes as listed on the gray sheet, <br /> which were bolded and underlined. <br /> NO PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that everyone from property owners to the owners of the <br /> speedway was invited to attend the SAP meetings. There were two Board of County <br /> Commissioners members participating. He said that it is important that this went very quickly <br /> and it was very collaborative. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to page 9 of the original abstract, item #7. He <br /> said that two issues came up and they tried to make a more definitive statement about Orange <br /> County's interest in having recreational facilities that were available to Orange County and that <br /> Orange County would be part of the process. He said that this was taking place right after <br /> Hillsborough was fighting to prevent an asphalt plant right next to the Agricultural Food <br /> Processing Center. He said that the group wanted it stated in writing that no asphalt plant <br /> would be permitted. He asked staff to address these concerns. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.