Orange County NC Website
of traffic that is anticipated on 54, the way light rail is being put in that corridor, it will reduce <br /> congestion 1-2% in that corridor. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that if the letter is addressed to the Chair, then the salutation <br /> should be to the Chair. If it is addressed to the TAC, then it should be the TAC in the <br /> salutation. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that all of the bulleted points need to have either a semi- <br /> colon or a period after them. Also, "southern' for Durham and "western" for Wake do not need <br /> to be capitalized.. <br /> Chair Pelissier made reference to the last bullet on page 4 and the parking spaces at <br /> Leigh Village. She asked whether the original number of spaces was 2000 or 3000 spaces, <br /> and Manager Clifton said it was 2000. She made a correction and said that it should say, "from <br /> the original" 2000 estimate at the end. <br /> The draft letter below is revised to include the Commissioners'comments: <br /> March 13, 2012 <br /> Lydia Lavelle, Chair <br /> Transportation Advisory Committee <br /> Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization <br /> 101 City Hall Plaza <br /> Durham, North Carolina 27701 <br /> Dear Chair Lavelle, <br /> On February 21 St, 2012 the Orange County Board of County Commissioners received a <br /> presentation on the Draft NC 54/1-40 Corridor Study Transportation-Land Use Master Plan. <br /> After the presentation, the Board has the following comments/questions about the Study: <br /> - Currently, Chapel Hill Transit operates 30 buses in the 54 corridor. The study <br /> should include a discussion about how the transit elements of the plan address this <br /> issue; <br /> - Orange County supports the recommendation that Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) be <br /> included in the 54 corridor. However, it is suggested that BRT service include <br /> dedicated bus lanes to further alleviate high traffic volumes. This could be possible <br /> by redesigning some or all of the new lanes suggested in the Durham County portion <br /> of the corridor to accommodate BRT or a combination of BRT and High-Occupancy <br /> Vehicles (HOV); <br /> - A more detailed explanation of how the recommendations accommodate the high <br /> commute volume to Orange County from southern Durham and western Wake <br /> County would be beneficial; <br /> - Orange County further suggests that the study explore incorporating dedicated bus <br /> lanes and/or HOV on the six-lane section of NC 54 in Orange County (from the <br /> Durham County line west) to complement the previous suggestion of including <br /> BRT/HOV lanes in the Durham County portion of NC 54; <br /> - Orange County supports the recommendation for a park and ride facility at NC 751 <br /> and Southpoint Auto Park Blvd and agrees that park and ride accommodations east <br /> of the 54/I-40 intersection is a good strategy for increasing mobility in the corridor; <br />