Minutes - 20040524 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Commissioner Gordon read from the first page which stated the problems with an LCWF such as igniting underground and above ground fires, environmental contamination, filling of drainage ways, increased truck traffic on rural roads, and dumping of materials other than land clearing waste. She said that the Planning Department has had a lot of trouble getting one elderly gentleman to get rid of his junk. She is not sure how this would work successfully. She is especially concerned about the dumping of materials other than land clearing waste. She said that it may be that a larger lot size could be required and that these LCWF sites should not be allowed in the higher density residential areas, including the Rural Buffer. She said that this is a potential nightmare and she feels really uncomfortable about it. Barry Katz asked about the organic material and if it had to be ground up. Robert Davis said that it could not stay over ground for more than 30 days. Barry Katz said that he is concerned about the amount of truck traffic. There is a commercial element that should not be mixing in with residential activities. He spoke about erosion and grading. Robert Davis distributed the pamphlets and said that there are stiff penalties an not following the rules. John Link said that the recommendation is to refer this to the Planning Board and they can discuss it further at that time. Commissioner Carey asked about the process if a farmer fills his two acres and wanted to do another one on another part of his property. Robert Davis said that they could subdivide and create another tract and do it again, but they could not have more than one LCWF on one tract, no matter how big it is. This is a State rule. Hunter Schofield said that he has buried many trees on his property. He said that 10 acres, which is the use value standard, is not that large and it may become a nuisance. Commissioner Brown asked about setbacks to other properties. Robert Davis said that if it is located more than 500 feet from adjacent roads or properties, there is no required buffer. If it is closer, a 100-foot buffer is required. Commissioner Brawn said that a lot more information is needed. This is not a farming activity, but it is a way to make income. However, she said that she could not imagine how it would be a good idea to allow these LCWF sites. She asked if there was a need for a lot more of these landfills. Robert Davis said that there are active sites in the County and this is a way to get a better hold on them. A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Gordan to refer the Proposed Amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of County Commissioners no sooner than August 17, 2004. VOTE: UNANIMOUS E. ADJOURNMENT