Minutes - 20040505 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

the Towns for their formal comment. He does not think that the public who have been reducing waste and recycling would want the County to not do anything or start retrenching. Chair Jacobs agreed with Commissioner Carey. He said that because they may not be ready to make a decision until early June, it gives them a chance to get back to the municipalities and have more discussion and communicate the history, the principles, the financials, and the alternatives. He would at least like the staff to look at a base fee and fold it into the property tax, and then do some public outreach over the summer and even have a public comment period. He said that, as part of deferring the totality of the fees far the additional services, he would develop a schedule of haw to adjust the fee if it went into place three or six months from now. Rod Visser said that if they are not ready to do this by the end of July, they would have to do some separate bills, and there would be additional costs. He said that there are some statutory distinctions as to why this is a fee and not a tax. It is a recoverable materials fee and not an availability fee or a solid waste fee. Because it is a fee, the Tax Collector will not be able to enforce collection, and they are assuming that the collection rate will be lower than the normal collection rate. If the fees are not on the tax bills, the collection rate will be even lower. Chair Jacobs said that if a financial analysis is done with the municipalities, it is reasonable to share with them the consequences of delaying the fee. They need to understand that their decision will directly affect their constituents, even though the County is the one forced to levy the fee. He made reference to an article in the newspaper today that said that Raleigh has a $7 per month household solid waste fee, and they are proposing that it go up to $10 per month. He would be surprised if Raleigh's level of service surpasses Orange County's. He would like to share a lot of the information through the media to the public and via a public hearing sa that people feel that they have at least been heard by the County Commissioners and get some answers. Commissioner Gordan said that it is the procedure to notify the other jurisdictions that a fee will be levied. She pointed out page 11, Interlocal Agreement Obligations, and read, "The County must give parties at least 30 days' notice of the effective date of the fee. The County must request the SWAB consider the proposed fee. If the SWAB approves the fee, then the fee will be considered fully approved when the Commissioners subsequently approve it. If the SWAB disapproves, then the fee may take effect only if the County or at least one other party subsequently approves it. The fee will take effect at the end of the notice period, or if later, the date of the last governing body approval if necessary." She said that she feels strongly that the County should stick with the deal that was made. She said that this is an enterprise fund and she would hate to go on the slippery slope of putting it in the tax rate. She is willing to give the function back if Chapel Hill and Carrboro want to take it back. As long as the County is doing it, she thinks they should stick with the deal that was made with the interlocal agreement. She thinks it is very important to get the input of the other jurisdictions. Chair Jacobs suggested, when the staff does the history, to put in what an enterprise fund is and how it differs from the other functions of County government. He thought that if part of this was in the property tax, that the County could still assign it to the enterprise fund.