Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
. ......... . <br />around the perimeter of both the speedway and go -kart facilities and a 50 -foot buffer <br />from NC Highway 57 and Bacon Road public rights -or -way. They also identify areas <br />where existing parking and /or facilities encroach into these buffers. <br />Staff would suggest that in these areas of encroachment, the density of landscaping <br />normally required in UDO Section 6.8.6 be concentrated into the open area outside of <br />the encroachment. Walls and berms may also be of benefit. <br />• June 5, 2012 — Receive Planning Board recommendation <br />d. Other <br />............_.._ ....._......... <br />............_ ..._......... <br />...._ ...._ _........... _ ............. <br />..._ ........._ _. .. <br />......_ ............. _..... <br />........... ...._._.. . <br />2. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM <br />Mission/Scope: Public Hearin <br />. _ ._........ <br />g process consistent with North Carolina State <br />Statutes and UDO Sub - sections 2.8.6 and 2.8.7 requirements. <br />a. Planning Board Review: <br />...... ... <br />.. <br />.............. .....__........ <br />December 7, 2011 Ordinance Review Committee discussed noise and <br />enforcement of the noise ordinance, and petroleum tanks on the Raceway <br />property, legal non - conformities. Board members requested some clarification on <br />the definition of semi - opaque buffers and questioned the need for military <br />installations. The Board members would like to build on the historic nature of the <br />area and deal with unique commercial enterprises already in existence. Board <br />members present did not express any reservations about moving forward with <br />these amendments <br />April 4, 2012 review and recommendation <br />.. ... ... <br />__ <br />b. Advisory Boards: <br />An informational meeting with the <br />former NC Highway 57 Speedway <br />SAP Workgroup was held on <br />November 3, 2011 <br />Presentation at the Durham /Orange/ <br />Chapel Hill Transportation <br />Coordinating Workgroup — December <br />13, 2011. <br />c. Local Government Review: <br />Durham City County Planning and <br />Person County as partners in the <br />Small Area Plan process. Ordinance <br />was mailed out during the week of <br />October 25, 2011. <br />Coincidently with County Peer <br />Review. <br />The group reviewed proposed <br />Ordinance amendment package and <br />felt that it was adequate. <br />The map found in the Applicability <br />section of the REDA -CZ -1 form was <br />presented with no ensuing <br />discussion. <br />No comments have been received. <br />7 <br />11 <br />