Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-05-2012 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2015 4:18:18 PM
Creation date
6/1/2012 2:47:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-05-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
ORD-2012-020 Proposed UDO Text Amendment: New Section 6.20: Public Sewer Connection
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Brian Crawford asked that the motion be extended because April 170' will not be enough <br />time to consider this. <br />Craig Benedict pointed out that the cost of connecting to the public sewer system is <br />probably comparable to creating a repair area. It may be financial viable and preferable to tie <br />into the system versus encumbering the land, etc. <br />Commissioner McKee withdrew his motion. Commissioner Foushee agreed. <br />Commissioner McKee informally asked the Planning Board to consider the comments <br />that were made about the repair area. <br />John Roberts said that once a motion has been made and seconded, then it has to have <br />a vote. <br />VOTE: All Nay <br />A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Foushee to <br />refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be returned to the <br />BOCC no sooner than April 17, 2012; and adjourn the public hearing until the BOCC considers <br />this item again in order to receive and accept the Planning Board's recommendation and any <br />submitted written comments. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments - To review gover ei <br />initiated amendments to thV text of the UDO to revise the Table of Permitted U s for <br />B -1 (Section 5.2) to make the district more retail- oriented and to revise ction <br />5.1. to reduce the list of Conditional Use District exclusions within the I d use <br />classi tions targeted for non - residential development. <br />Planner <br />Unified Development Ordl <br />UDO/ZONING 2012 -01 <br />Quarterly Public Hearing <br />February 27, 2012 <br />Item C.6 <br />made a PowerPoint presentation. <br />(UDO) Amendments <br />Sections Proposed for AmeXn <br />❑ Section 5.1.4 — Condit <br />❑ Section 5.2.2 — Table es- Econom' Deve l <br />Only) <br />Purpose <br />To create additional econ is development options in the areas <br />higher intensity develo ent <br />❑ Redu�tl_mist of Conditional Use Exclusions for the following <br />ercial- Industrial Transition Activity Node <br />Economic Development Transition Activity Node <br />❑ 32 uses not permitted as a Conditional Use <br />Districts (EDB -1 District <br />County designated for <br />Classifications: <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.