Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
17 <br />WHAT THIS DOES NOT DO: <br />Alter /modify submittal requirements <br />Alter /modify pre - application standards (i.e. balloon test, notification of surrounding <br />property owners, etc.) <br />ter /modify inspection requirements for towers both during and after construction <br />Eli 'nate /modify required fees, including consulting escrow fee <br />RECOMMEND ,ION: <br />1. Receive th request, <br />2. Conduct the blic Hearing and accept public, BOCC, and Planning Board mments <br />3. Refer the matte to the Planning Board with a request that a recommend on be <br />returned to the Co ty Board of Commissioners in time for the May 1 12 BOCC <br />regular meeting. <br />4. Adjourn the public hear until May, 2012 in order to receive a accept the Planning <br />Board's recommendation d any submitted written comme <br />Clarifying questions were answer by staff. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that the tbkver heightrelpt6d to bird fatalities. He suggested that it <br />would be nice to track that in the document so how. missioner Jacobs made reference to <br />,pf page 5 and avoiding areas with protected natural 7��Itural resources. He asked about the <br />environmental assessment. <br />Michael Harvey made reference to paps 25- 2)here there are provisions about <br />environmental assessments. \ <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that a County requires �t developments identify significant <br />natural areas and have a plan to pro &&tt them or avoid them. He,,would like this reflected. <br />A motion was made by mmissioner Hemminger, secon d by Commissioner Yuhasz to <br />refer the matter to the Planni Board with a request that a recomme ation be returned to the <br />County Board of C:22nocomments. m' hers in time for the May 1, 2012 BOCC reg ar meeting and adjourn the <br />public hearing until 12 in order to receive and accept the Planning oard's recommendation <br />and any submitted <br />VOTE: UNAN <br />�nmissioner Yuhasz asked to amend the motion to include Commissioner <br />about the natural areas. <br />ON AMENDED MOTION: UNANIMOUS <br />5. Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments - To review government - <br />initiated amendments to the text of the UDO to add a new Section 6.20 that will pertain to <br />public sewer connection requirements. <br />Planning staff Kevin Lindley gave background on this material. In general, this is a new <br />section, Section 6.20. About 25 years ago, the County invested in a small sewer system in <br />Efland for the general purpose of improving public health by helping out with some failing septic <br />systems. The County is currently constructing a sewer system as an extension to that original <br />