Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
W] <br />From: Efland, Taylor [mai Ito: t-efla nd@ti.com] <br />Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:47 PM <br />To: Efland, Taylor; Kevin Lindley <br />Cc: sdmontana @gmail.com; peterefland @yahoo.com; signatureblindsinc @yahoo.com; Frank Clifton; Debra Graham; <br />Donna Baker; Craig Benedict; Bernadette Pelissier <br />Subject: RE: Proposal of ammendment 6.20.1 <br />Kevin, please accept and consider this as formal part of the public record pertaining to the proposed amendment 6.20.1 <br />1. In the cover letter there is reference to "newly constructed" second line of paragraph two, and in "D" of the amendment <br />it eludes to required usage connection does not applying to existing working systems. Hence, it might be more <br />appropriate restate the introduction to "A" of the amendment as "(A) All structures or properties constructed after "date <br />of amendment proposal" used for ......... ". The entire context of the amendment would be set immediately and what <br />follows would be much clearer. <br />2. In paragraph "(C)" sub paragraph "(1)" the language is a little confusing with reference to paragraph "(B) ". It would <br />seem that "(C) sub (1)" could be clearer to understand if paragraph "B" were re written as "If the said new structure ... ". <br />a. It just seems that paragraph "B" and "C" area little confusing sense "B" references "C" and "C" references <br />back up to "B "; hence, it is a circular reference. Maybe sense "B" is about pumping requirements of a new <br />system that does not meet the downhill grade, and "C" is about exceptions, then just removing the reference to <br />"C" in paragraph "B" would remove the circular reference. <br />3. Further in paragraph "(C)" subparagraph "(1)" it is stated "If aseptic system repair .....Department and the connection <br />....would require ....as given in (B) above ....... Owner shall be allowed to use either of these two options." seems to be <br />ambiguous. Does the "and" mean like a logical "and" such that both conditions have to be true or should that be an "or" <br />meaning as stated "allowed to use either of these two options "; otherwise, I would ask what does "allow to use either of <br />these two options" mean. <br />Anyway it seems that (C) could be written and stated more clearly and not left open for interpretation. <br />Regards, <br />Taylor R Efland, PE <br />