Browse
Search
Minutes - 20040429
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Minutes - 20040429
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 3:25:42 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:21:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/29/2004
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-29-2004-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-1a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-2a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-3a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-4a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-6a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-6b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-7a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
Agenda - 04-29-2004-9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 04-29-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jim Ward said that there should be an imperative that they will not be forced into a position <br />where they need to go to Jordan Lake. He said that maybe an adequate public facilities <br />ordinance could be created for water services. He asked if this was an appropriate tool and <br />where OWASA stands on looking at same water resource before the quarry comes online. Pat <br />Davis said that there are other components in the master plan that address these issues. He <br />said that they are getting close to the crossroads of making the decisions about meeting the <br />demands for water. <br />Dan Okun said that he was with the University (retired, but still active). He read a prepared <br />statement, as follows: <br />Water Reclamation for Nonpatable Reuse: <br />An Established Urban Practice <br />By <br />Daniel A. Okun <br />My purpose here is to assure you that water reclamation for non-potable reuse is a well- <br />established approach to urban water management throughout the developed world. In fact, the <br />State of California adopted regulations for the practice in 1918 and, because the federal <br />government has na regulations, their 1968 "Title 22" has become a guide to the regulation of <br />reclamation to this date. Currently, some forty states have their own regulations. <br />In 1962, the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, which provide sewerage for the many <br />cities in the county, other than the City of Las Angeles, built the Whittier Narrows tertiary <br />wastewater reclamation plant. It provides water for many non-potable purposes in the service <br />area and for recharge of the groundwater. The rapid growth of population of southern <br />California, and the very limited water resources in the region, resulted in the construction of six <br />additional reclamation facilities in the county, its growth of population to about 10 million people <br />would not have been possible without water reclamation. <br />I was fortunate to be employed by the California Department of Health Services in the 197Q's to <br />review experiences with the many urban non-potable reuse projects existing then throughout <br />southern California with the aim of improving Title 22, and I have been involved as a consultant <br />in California ever since. While water is being transferred from "water-rich" northern California to <br />southern California, reclamation is now growing rapidly in the north. <br />Thirty years ago, a friend, the director of Public Works for the City of St. Petersburg, Florida, <br />was faced with a problem; the state had introduced mare stringent standards for nutrient <br />removal from wastewaters being discharged to sea. We believed that they might save money <br />for wastewater treatment by reclaiming the wastewater for non-potable uses in the city. The <br />added costs would be far the addition of tertiary wastewater treatment and the creation of a dual <br />distribution system. <br />It became an instant success. Golf courses were the first users, as has been the case in North <br />Carolina, but reclaimed water is now provided for other sports fields, landscape irrigation, <br />cooling towers for power plants, air conditioning, toilet flushing, environmental amenities, <br />concrete for construction, and car washes. It is one of the few cities that designed its reclaimed <br />water system far enhancing its fire protection. <br />Despite the fact that annual rainfall in Florida is much the same as in North Carolina, urban <br />growth in Florida has been so great, it rivals California in the number of its dual systems. This <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.