Browse
Search
Minutes - 20040329
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Minutes - 20040329
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 3:29:46 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:20:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/29/2004
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-29-2004-
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 03-29-2004
Agenda - 03-29-2004-a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 03-29-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Jacobs said that they could ask staff to give them those details and the staffs could work <br />together and have Environmental Health look at the soils. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that in terms of what Orange County could do, she is not familiar <br />with any zoning area in the rural buffer that would be different. There is only one category in the <br />rural buffer. <br />Craig Benedict said that Environmental Health could not do a lot-by-lot analysis, but they can do <br />a generalized description of the soils in the area. <br />Edith Wiggins said that one of the purposes of a community meeting is to target those few <br />families that would be adversely affected and then they would know before any decisions were <br />made. She said that it makes a big difference to a family whose roots have been in Orange <br />County far many years. <br />Mark Kleinschmidt asked if another option would be to rezone that area. Roger Waldon said <br />that Chapel Hill does have more zoning categories areas than the JPA allows for. If the <br />objective is to have no adverse impact on property owners, then the logical action would be to <br />take no action and leave things as they are. If the jurisdiction changes from Chapel Hill to <br />Orange County, then the zoning changes. His opinion is that the impact would be minimal for <br />many of the properties. <br />Mayor Foy asked about the RT designation and Roger Waldon said that Rural Transition is a 2- <br />acre minimum lot size. <br />Geof Gledhill said that once the land use plan changes and this area becomes rural buffer then <br />Orange County would maintain the zoning. <br />Chair Jacobs said that one way to deal with this is to say that they have had discussions and <br />have referred it to staff and work with Environmental Health, determine who will hold a public <br />information meeting in the community, and change the order so that Chapel Hill approves first. <br />Chair Jacobs said that they need motions but Carrboro's would be after May 10tH <br />Town of Chapel Hill: <br />A motion was made by Jim Ward, seconded by Bill Strom to accept the Planning Staff's <br />recommendation to refer the proposed amendment to the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan to <br />the Chapel Hill Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Chapel Hill Town <br />Council no sooner than May 10, 2004. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Town of Carrboro: <br />A motion was made by Alex Zaffron, seconded by Joal Hall Braun to accept the Planning Staff's <br />recommendation to refer the proposed amendment to the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan to <br />the Carrboro Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Carrboro Board of <br />Aldermen no sooner than May 10, 2004. <br />Orange County: <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Gordan to accept <br />the Planning Staff's recommendation to refer the proposed amendment to the Joint Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.