Minutes - 20040329 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Public Comment Barry Katz said that he thinks on a practical basis, this is about a zoning from one unit per acre to one unit per three acres. He heard from Craig Benedict that this is Triassic soil and you would need close to three acres to get a perk site. He does not see a dramatic difference between what can practically be done under the proposed rules versus what exists now. Bill Strom asked Mayor Foy how he would envision the Council would proceed at this point. Mayor Foy said that the plan was for the Council to refer comments back to Chapel Hill's staff and to come back with a recommendation. It is possible that the recommendation would be to have another public hearing. He suggested continuing on and having a community meeting at the church. Chair Jacobs asked Roger Waldon about the land use plan update and the decisions that were made. Roger Waldon said that the decision that was made in 2000 was at the end of discussions with the Council. They ended up focusing on the urban boundary and there were some areas in the south that were envisioned to stay low density and not become urban in character. The policy decision was to be the vision for those areas that they would not be urban and therefore would not be in the urban services boundary. Chair Jacobs asked if .92 acres was consistent with "non-urban." Roger Waldon made reference to the area in the vicinity of the church and said that the policy determination of the Council was that it was not envisioned to become urban and will not have water and sewer and will not become more dense. Bill Strom asked what kind of notification would have been given to this community and Roger Waldon said that it was not direct mail notice, but was part of a larger process at that time and they had had a number of print ads. Edith Wiggins said that she remembers that a lot of citizens advocated to putting as much land in the rural buffer as possible. She does not remember any citizens asking them to allow for continued subdividing of the land and giving it to their children. Her reservations at that time were taking more land out that could have been used for affordable housing. The agreement within the Council was to identify more corridors in Chapel Hill and devote them specifically for more affordable housing. She is glad that Mark Chilton has raised this and maybe we need to find out, in light of septic tank requirements, if this is something that we can make modifications in the plan or if it makes no difference. She said that people may not be aware that they cannot subdivide in the future and there should be a real study of what the situation is. She suggested continuing the process, but getting mare information about the conditions. Alex Zaffron said that this does not need to involve all three jurisdictions and Chapel Hill needs to review this issue and the policy decisions that were made. Mayor Foy said that it would be surprising to him if Chapel Hill wanted to reopen discussions of the Comprehensive Plan. He said that what is going on here is that Orange County is going to accept control back. Chair Jacobs said that Environmental Health could look at the soils more closely and share the information with all three boards. Mark Chilton said that there are probably a number of landowners with public right-of-way access issues that would prohibit them from dividing their land anyway.