Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C9
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2015 4:28:30 PM
Creation date
5/17/2012 3:10:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/27/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C9
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-27-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />The new law has the following impact: <br />1. Adoption of Ordinances modifying the County Zoning Atlas, the statute of <br />limitations on submitting the appeal has been lengthened from 30 to 60 days. <br />2. The law lengthens the statute of limitations from 2 months to 3 years for suits <br />alleging irregularities in ordinance adoption and clarifies that the timeline to <br />appeal begins from the date of ordinance adoption. <br />3. With respect to contesting the validity of text amendments, the statute of <br />limitations to file an appeal is extended from 2 months to 1 year. However, the <br />General Assembly has included language indicating that the `period of appeal' <br />does not even begin to run until the party, typically the property owner, "first has <br />standing to challenge the ordinance." <br />From staff's standpoint this practically extends the ability for an appeal to be filed <br />in perpetuity. <br />4. A final modification allows individuals to challenge the validity of an ordinance <br />during appeals of enforcement actions regardless of how many years has passed <br />since the ordinance was adopted. -Prior to the adoption of this law, North Carolina <br />case law has held that a violator may not raise the possible invalidity of the <br />ordinance violated as a defense to an enforcement action. This is no longer the <br />case. <br />E. SPECIFIC AMENDMENT LANGUAGE <br />Please refer to Attachment 3 <br />Primary Staff Contact: <br />Michael D. Harvey <br />Planning <br />(919) 245 -2597 <br />mharvey @co.orange.nc.us <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.