Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C7
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C7
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2015 4:25:12 PM
Creation date
5/17/2012 3:07:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/27/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C7
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-27-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 27 7 <br /> UDO Amendment Packet Notes <br /> The North Carolina Division of Water Quality was required to develop nutrient reduction <br /> strategies for both Falls Lake and Jordan Lake. Consequently, the state adopted rules <br /> requiring new stormwater standards for new development projects. The Falls Lake and <br /> Jordan Lake rules mandate that local governments amend their development ordinances to <br /> meet these stormwater standards. <br /> The state also required that proposed amendments be submitted to the state for approval <br /> by DWQ and the Environmental Management Commission (EMC). The EMC approved <br /> Orange County's proposed amendments to the UDO on January 12, 2012. <br /> The following amendment package shows the proposed changes to the LIDO that was <br /> approved by the state to meet the Falls Lake and Jordan Lake rules. Proposed changes are <br /> shown as follows: <br /> Red text: additions to the UDO needed to meet the state's requirements <br /> Strike thFE)ugb4e-A deletions the UDO needed to meet the state's requirements <br /> Generally, only the pages of the UDO with a proposed change are included in the packet. <br /> The exception is where a page needed to be included in order to be clear about which <br /> section of the LIDO was proposed for amendment. Please note that the page numbers in <br /> this amendment packet may or may not correspond to the page numbers in the adopted <br /> UDO because adding text may shift all of the text/sections downward. You are encouraged <br /> to review this amendment packet in the context of having your complete UDO available for <br /> referencing as needed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.