Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2015 4:15:11 PM
Creation date
5/17/2012 3:02:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/27/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C4
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-27-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 5: Uses <br /> Section 5.10: Standards for Telecommunication Facilities 45 <br /> If en Annlinent proposes- to nlnoe telenomm uniootions eo inmen+ <br /> at a loGati6n that'S Rot a preferred prierity 1 site, then the <br /> AppliGant must provide a detailed explanatiOR as to why a higher <br /> nrio Fwty site is not proposed. The explanation shell be-i.. the farm <br /> of a written r nFt demonstrating the Annlisen+'s Feview of the <br /> p4 Ga4oR she <br /> that the_teleoommI�n'ng+inns equipment may of he si+e�cced-at-a <br /> higher priority s'+e heneuse of eommern' <br /> �-c <br /> beGause no higher PFiGFity site is available that would sewe to <br /> p Feyide the teleoommuninetions nsine need identified by the <br /> AR AppliGant may not by pass sites of higheF ppkwity-� <br /> b----se the site proposed is the only site lensed or elented <br /> shall not be a va"d basis for aRy Glaim of <br /> GtiGabW. <br /> i#i NGMithstanding-that-apoteatial sate may be situated;n aR a ea <br /> shall net be appFE)ved if it GGRfliGtG with the PFeViGiGRs and <br /> requiFements of this OFdinanGe. <br /> ¢Vi\ Wireless S U„ngF+s+r.JntU Fes shall not he Ivn^,terd withiR e half <br /> 11/_\ mile of onv existing monopole lottine n vend w4ele <br /> a. A n eevoen+ion may he allowed when the onnliGan+Ga <br /> sUffiniently demonstrate that• <br /> i. Appmpriate spaGe on the existing <br /> telenemmi n ne+'n eless s oFt s+ + is <br /> ....��..i..,.�.va.•.v�� vv��..,�..,v.,vu NNvrz acruoac�rc-rte <br /> not available; eF <br /> H4 The appliGant has made geed faith effeFt to <br /> negotiate o eat with owneF of the <br /> „�vcrca ° <br /> existing wireless telenemmllnlGation support <br /> a+r z c+a rc and has been URGLIGGessf rI-which <br /> must be dE)GUmented ;R wFiting; or <br /> M. The teleonmmi n n+ion eq i nt on the <br /> existing a Feless tole ation s n Ft <br /> StFUGtUre is not GGmpatible with the pFeposed <br /> 6r <br /> met of the lonr�t'o of+he e..is+ing ufreles <br /> StFUGWre Gannet be FeaSGRably modified to <br /> aGGE)Mmodate additional Go IOGatien by the <br /> U pp4G.aPt_. <br /> Orange County, North Carolina-Unified Development Ordinance Page 5-107 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.