Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2015 4:15:11 PM
Creation date
5/17/2012 3:02:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/27/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C4
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-27-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 5: Uses <br /> 40 Section 5.10: Standards for Telecommunication Facilities <br /> f. The Inspections Division shall be notified in writing when <br /> a required analysis is complete. A copy of the analysis <br /> report shall be made available to the County Inspections <br /> Division upon request. That report shall also give details <br /> of the net result of any changes made to the tower or its <br /> appurtenances since the last inspection. <br /> (') Fees and Charges <br /> (a) A AiRg fee as set by the Board of County Commissioners shall be paid <br /> upon applieatien for a Building PeFfflit, Sate Plan approval or SpeGial Use <br /> PeFMit. in addition, an inspeGtion fee is due the County at the time of <br /> future inspeGtions. SUGh fees may refleGt the County's fully alleGat <br /> costs, el shall + d s, h nests <br /> fh\ P„hNn lone) or Fight <br /> separate instrument and reGorded prior to the iissuanGe ef Buel <br /> PeFrnitS. <br /> nn n4 of an n, # 'r+e n It t in ad an acid in orpn rate these <br /> GhaFges and fees into aR apploGatiGR fee that is based OR the reason <br /> Gonsultant shall not exGeed what is usual and GUGtGrnar��� <br /> faGilities and support structures. The foregoing does pFe";k;+f6- <br /> GGURty fFeM impesiRg additional reasonable GOst based fees for the <br /> app!'Gat;GR due to ameRdments or revisions to the original appliGati <br /> fee shall be separately ideRtified arid disGiesed to the appliGant—On <br /> PF40F to the formal submittal of an appkatiGR. The eSGFE)w aME)UR <br /> either the approval of the GeFtif*Gate of QGG61paRGY(GO), or the <br /> be Fetumed to the designated party <br /> Stan laMs fer SPOGial Use Dermifc 27- <br /> The eveFall Poky and desired geals for SpeGiakuse Permits for wireless <br /> wherever possible, the fall i _ <br /> (a) AlteFRatives to GeR6tFUGtiRg new wireless support struGtures, <br /> b, + t 1'm'+ d + the n In f n of wireless t I et' ns <br /> 26 Moved to a new central section of the code as part of the proposed re-formatting. <br /> 27 Moved to a new central section of the code. No modification of existing development standards were proposed <br /> for the Special Use Permit process other than the allowable height for each category(i.e.Class A versus Class B) <br /> Orange County, North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 5-102 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.