Browse
Search
Minutes 02-27-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 02-27-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 10:47:22 AM
Creation date
5/17/2012 2:51:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/27/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C6
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C7
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C8
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-27-2012 - C9
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-27-2012-C10
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-27-2012 - Quarterly Public Hearing
ORD-2012-005 Ordinance approving Fiscal Year 2011-12 Budget Amendment #6
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
■ Services * <br /> ■ Transportation <br /> ■ Miscellaneous <br /> EDE-1 Doesn't Allow: <br /> ■ Aqricultural <br /> ■ Construction <br /> ■ Information <br /> ■ Manufacturinq Assemblv& Processinq <br /> ■ Recreation <br /> ■ Wholesale Trade <br /> ■ Economic Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2) � <br /> EDE-2 Allows: <br /> ■ Aqricultural <br /> ■ Construction <br /> ■ Finance <br /> ■ Government <br /> ■ Manufacturinq Assemblv & Processina <br /> ■ Retail <br /> ■ Services <br /> ■ Transportation <br /> ■ Wholesale Trade <br /> EDE-2 Doesn't Allow: <br /> ■ Information <br /> ■ Recreation <br /> ■ Residential <br /> Recommendations <br /> 1. Receive the proposal to amend: <br /> a. Land Use <br /> b. Zoning <br /> 2. Conduct the Public Hearing and receive public, BOCC and Planning Board comments, <br /> 3. Refer the matter to Planning Board to be returned for BOCC action by April 17, 2012, <br /> 4. Adjourn the Public Hearing until April 17, 2012 to receive any written comments between <br /> February 27, 2012 and Planning Board recommendation. <br /> Eno Neighborhood Meeting <br /> Citizen Comments <br /> 1. Stoney Creek Basin EDE-1 vs. EDE-2 <br /> The EDE-2 is suggested by staff because of the frontage along I-85 and its relative <br /> isolation befinreen the interstate, Mt. Herman Church Road, railroad tracks, and high <br /> voltage primary electric transmission lines. The opposite side of the road is also <br /> EDE-2. <br /> 2. Resource Protection Areas (RPA) <br /> RPAs are a layer of the land use plan and are still operational. <br /> 3. What is light industrial compare Orange County and Durham County? <br /> The uses were discussed during the Eno EDD SAP meetings and comparability was <br /> achieved. <br /> 4. Why now? Public utilities <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.