Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Brian Crawford asked that the motion be extended because April 17�'will not be enough <br /> time to consider this. <br /> Craig Benedict pointed out that the cost of connecting to the public sewer system is <br /> probably comparable to creating a repair area. It may be financial viable and preferable to tie <br /> into the system versus encumbering the land, etc. <br /> Commissioner McKee withdrew his motion. Commissioner Foushee agreed. <br /> Commissioner McKee informally asked the Planning Board to consider the comments <br /> that were made about the repair area. <br /> John Roberts said that once a motion has been made and seconded, then it has to have <br /> a vote. <br /> VOTE: All Nay <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Foushee to <br /> refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be returned to the <br /> BOCC no sooner than April 17, 2012; and adjourn the public hearing until the BOCC considers <br /> this item again in order to receive and accept the Planning Board's recommendation and any <br /> submitted written comments. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 6. Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments-To review government- <br /> initiated amendments to the'text of the UDO to revise the Table of Permitted Uses for <br /> EDB-1 (Section 5.2) to make the district more retail-oriented and to revise Section <br /> 5.1.4 to reduce the list of Cdnditional Use District exclusions within the land use <br /> classifications targeted for non-residential development. <br /> Planner Shannon Berry made a PowerPoint presentation. <br /> Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Amendments <br /> UDO/ZONING 2012-01 <br /> Quarterly Public Hearing <br /> February 27, 2012 <br /> Item C.6 <br /> Sections Proaosed for Amendment <br /> ❑ Section 5.1.4—Conditional Uses <br /> ❑ Section 5.2.2—Table of Permitted Uses-Economic Development Districts (EDB-1 District <br /> Only) <br /> Pur ose <br /> To create additional economic development options in the areas of the County designated for <br /> higher intensity development <br /> Proposed Chanaes to Section 5.1.4 <br /> ❑ Reduce the List of Conditional Use Exclusions for the following Land Use Classifications: <br /> ■ Commercial-Industrial Transition Activity Node <br /> ■ Economic Development Transition Activity Node <br /> Conditional Use Exclusions -Current <br /> ❑ 32 uses not permitted as a Conditional Use <br />