Orange County NC Website
the ability to approve those minor deviations if there is a public purpose or a public benefit that <br />could be derived from making those minor deviations. <br />The first one is the maximum floor area in the ED-Limited Office - in the Linear Office District. That <br />district is set up for a minimum 20,000-square foot size lot. We have a maximum floor area ratio of <br />5,000 square feet for each building of the 20,000. It is roughly 25 percent of the lot that could be <br />covered with the building. <br />This particular zoning lot, once you do the two additions for the two properties, will be 3.25 acres or <br />141,000 square feet. If you played out the 20,000-square foot lot, that would be the equivalent of <br />about 40,000 square feet that you could actually build on those lots if they were all individually <br />subdivided and then brought back in with their 5,000-square foot maximums each. However, the <br />Credit Union is not proposing to do that. <br />The other thing that could have happened on this site is, had the Credit Union not purchased the <br />property, that adjacent properly could have been subdivided into 20,000-square foot lots and each <br />of those could have come back with 5,000-square foot additions. So, roughly 10,000 square feet <br />could have been built if that adjacent property had been sold, or if someone else had purchased it, <br />and they legally subdivided it and then brought back a requirement. <br />You could have had up to 40,000 square feet on the same size lot, ar, under the second scenario, <br />you could have had an additional 10,000 on that adjacent lot. What they are asking for is 7,334 <br />square feet total for the entire 3.25-acre site. It is up to the Board to decide and the Planning Board <br />to look at as to whether or not this request has sufficient public benefit to allow this request as it is <br />now being proposed. <br />The second deviation that the Credit Union is requesting will be the Hillsborough Area EDD, which <br />was approved by BOCC as not allowing drive-through facilities. The four lanes that are there now <br />are technically grand-fathered in. They are also under a Special Use Permit and they cannot be <br />deemed illegal under the Special Use Permit (SUP} because the SUP was in place when the new <br />zoning was put into effect. Sa the additional lane would be a request to deviate from the standards <br />of no drive-through facilities. The 33 percent expansion would be a request to this Board. <br />The Planning Department researched this to find out what they may or may not be doing. They are <br />promoting their Internet banking. The Credit Union is encouraging people to da more of their <br />business by the Internet. The Credit Union will then be able to reduce the amount of "sit" times for <br />people looking to transact business at the drive-through. They are looking to service their existing <br />clients and possible increase their clientele. There is a limitation as to what can be added to the <br />Credit Union based on their criteria. I don't think just anyone can join the Credit Union. So they are <br />limited as to who would be able to join the Credit Union over the long term. They are looking at this <br />expansion as a way to serve their existing client base, which they feel could also reduce emissions <br />because people are sitting far shorter amounts of time. <br />The third issue or deviation is really not a deviation. The maximum building height in this proposed <br />district is 30 feet. The existing building is, in a couple of places, 35 feet. But what the Credit Union <br />in asking to add on is significantly less than the 30 feet. Any addition that they are looking to add <br />on to this building meets the requirements of the district. But, if it's rezoned to PD-ED-LNR, you will <br />have anon-conforming situation and would need a deviation that is five feet, which would be a little <br />bit too tall. <br />There were conditions placed on this in 1997. We have incorporated all of those back to it, related <br />to sewer and landscaping. NCDOT requirements back then were to dedicate right-of-ways, which <br />they did. For some reason it has not shown up on the Land Records system, but there was right-of- <br />way dedicated along Hwy 86 for 20 feet. And the Credit Union has requested an additional five feet <br />