Orange County NC Website
Commissioner Jacobs asked Frank Clifton if he had any sense from Durham that they <br />would charge different if it was just Orange County versus the towns. <br />Frank Clifton said not at this time. The first priority is to have a destination and the <br />second priority is the cost. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made an amendment to the motion to direct staff to proceed with <br />Durham to accept Orange County's waste but also ask staff to similarly get cost estimates if the <br />current partners were to participate with fhe County. <br />Commissioner McKee accepted the amendment. <br />Commissioner Gordon suggested pursuing this agreement with Durham and having <br />staff come back with parameters. <br />Commissioner Jacobs wants to know if the County bundles trash with the municipalities <br />if it would get a better price. <br />Commissioner Hemminger seconded the motion. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Chair Pelissier suggested sending a letter to the towns letting them know that the <br />County is not negotiating on behalf of the towns. <br />Commissioner Foushee said that she wants to talk about the next steps. She said that it <br />is time for Orange County to have a real discussion about what happens to material solid waste <br />and to engage with the towns and UNC as to where the trash goes. She suggested that UNC <br />should be one of the partners. <br />Commissioner Yuhasz said that it is incumbent upon the County to find the right place to <br />put the trash in the County. He said that it is a problem that is not going away. <br />Commissioner McKee said that there is a mobile home park beside the rural buffer and <br />this is a neighborhood just as much as any of the other neighborhoods that are represented <br />here. He said that the County needs to be responsible for its own trash and they need to look <br />at options with their partners if they wish to bring forth a site on the town's property or UNC. He <br />is not willing to look at this rural buffer site for a transfer station. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the letter to the towns and what it would say. It <br />needs to be clear that the County will not be negotiating for the towns. She wants to leave it <br />open for the partners to join at any time. <br />Chair Pelissier said that the letter would say that the County would negotiate on Orange <br />County's behalf and they would want to know what the costs are to the partners and UNC. The <br />letter would ask the partners if they were willing to join in on the negotiations. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that before there could be any consideration of this site, it <br />would be only fair to have another comprehensive and deliberative process because that was <br />the type of process used when the Board was considering other sites. She said that she does <br />have grave concerns about this particular site. <br />Commissioner Hemminger echoed what Commissioner Gordon said. At this point, she <br />does not agree with the process because it has not been public. The process needs to include <br />the partners involved. She does not like the Durham Transfer Station option either, but it had to <br />be done. <br />Commissioner Jacobs thanked Mayor Chilton for making an attempt to be a leader. He <br />thinks that Mayor Chilton has been diligent in trying to work on the solid waste issues. He does <br />disagree with the conclusion, but he appreciates his effort. He reminded the Board that <br />Commissioner Moses Carey, when he was the Chair in 2007, sent a letter to the Mayors of <br />Chapel Hill and Carrboro to solicit interest in participating in a solid waste disposal solution and <br />pointed out that it would be costly to not have a solution. There was never a response. He <br />