Browse
Search
Minutes 02-21-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 02-21-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2012 2:19:33 PM
Creation date
5/2/2012 2:19:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/21/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 4a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 5c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 5d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 5e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 5f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 5g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 5h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 5i
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 5j
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 8a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 8b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 8c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 8d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 8e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 8f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012 - 9a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012-12a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012-12b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012-12c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012-13 (1)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012-13 (2)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012-13 (3)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 02-21-2012-13 (4)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 02-21-2012 - Regular Mtg.
ORD-2012-006 Amending The Unified Development Ordinance of Orange County
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-007 An Ordinance Amending the Orange County Zoning Atlas – Carolina Friends Schools
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-008 (not approved) An Ord Denying an Amendment Request to the Orange County Zoning Atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-019 Resolution Adopting BOCC Advisory Board Policy and Repealing the Conflicting Provisions of All Prior Advisory Board Policies and Resolutions
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-021 Resolution Supporting An Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to Clarify That Corporations Are Not Persons
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-022 Resolution approving Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-023 Resolution approving Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-024 Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of Limited Obligation Bonds to Finance CHCCS Elem #11, Other County Capital Projects & Refinance of Existing Obligations
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. In the case of Orange County, there are four basic categories of end state <br />downstream processes to consider for the desired future: <br />a. Landfill in Orange County <br />b. Advanced technology waste to energy process in Orange County <br />c. Landfill outside of Orange County <br />d. Advanced technology waste to energy process outside of Orange County <br />3. Two of these choices should have no need for a waste transfer station in Orange <br />County. They are the ones where the final process takes place in Orange County. The <br />other two might not need a waste transfer station in Orange County if the final process <br />was close to the population being served. Therefore, a waste transfer station is not a <br />logical proposal until the final "resting place" for our non-recyclable waste is defined. <br />Otherwise there is a good chance of a wasted investment and short and long term <br />consequences to the integrity of the Rural Buffer. <br />4. The challenge of developing an integrated plan for a County with the various issues <br />of population density, land use plans and transportation networks that exist here is <br />daunting. To many persons, an integrated plan means having one method that all <br />citizens utilize. Another view of an integrated plan is one where the differences that <br />exist are comprehended and alternate strategies are implemented so that the different <br />needs are met. I believe the latter method has a greater chance of success in our <br />County. <br />5. Although we are one County, there are two fundamentally different regions. One is <br />south of I-40 and is comprised primarily of Chapel Hill, UNC, and Carrboro. The other <br />region contains Hillsborough and the unincorporated areas of Orange County. <br />Population density differences are a key factor of these two regions. <br />6. I have a strong belief that leadership has a responsibility for creating a compelling <br />vision. I have no leadership role within this County, but I'm willing to share my vision to <br />stimulate discussion. My vision for this County has three elements for implementation: <br />a. The current excellent recycling process is maintained and improved with a <br />benchmarking study to identify global best practices and then implementation <br />plans created to execute improvement. <br />b. An advanced technology waste to energy facility is implemented to serve the <br />area south of I-40 at an appropriate location within the bounds of Chapel Hill, <br />UNC and Carrboro. The key stakeholders are Chapel Hill, UNC and Carrboro. I <br />submit that Chapel Hill Transit and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School system are <br />initiatives that recognize the existence of this "southern region". <br />c. A partnership is created between Hillsborough, Orange County and the city <br />of Durham to manage the non-recyclable solid waste of these areas. I-85 is a <br />natural conduit for such a partnership. Through a true partnership, improved <br />processes could be jointly developed for the near term for improved standards at <br />the Durham waste transfer station and then the creation of a plan for a waste to <br />energy facility that would support Hillsborough, the unincorporated region of <br />Orange County and the city of Durham when appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.