Orange County NC Website
Analysis guidelines. Regardless, the White Paper makes the case that the 15-501 alignment <br />should have been included in the Alternatives Analysis. He said that the Alternatives Analysis <br />also did not involve state resource agencies with known interests in critical natural areas. He <br />encouraged the County Commissioners to not put this sales tax on the ballot until and unless <br />they are comfortable with the information and alternatives that have been provided and until <br />everyone's voices are heard. <br />Glenn Wilson agreed with John Wilson's comments. <br />Damon Seils is from Carrboro. He said that the Locally Preferred Alternative is a product of <br />years of study, numerous public presentations, and thorough consideration by town and County <br />staff, local elected officials, and regional transportation bodies. There has been some discussion <br />about studying various transit enhancements for 15-501. He said that he is confident that all <br />parties can work together to study this separate issue. He said that the issues with 15-501 <br />should not prevent the Board from sending this to the next stage in the process. <br />Harry Johnson is a UNC School of Law student and he is part of a coalition of UNC-Chapel Hill <br />students who urge the County Commissioners to put this transit tax on the ballot in November. <br />He has lived in Orange County for three years and he cannot wait for better transit and rail <br />service in Orange County. He said that improved service on 15-501 should be encouraged, but <br />should not hinder this process from going forward at this time. He said to focus on the plan that <br />has been approved by Triangle Transit for the past seven years. <br />Stewart Boss is also a UNC student and a part of a student coalition that supports the transit tax. <br />He said that he is from Charlotte where there is transit and light rail and he has seen that it can <br />work. He feels that the proposal has been fairly studied and he would like to see it come for a <br />public vote in November. <br />Jeffery Greene is a resident of the Orange County section of Meadowmont. He supports the <br />draft LPA recommended by the MPO's Technical Coordinating Committee last month. He said <br />that investing monies into a rail line is an unquestioned positive. He said that this should not be <br />difficult to implement. <br />Jeff Schmidt is a resident of Cedar Grove. He made reference to the resolution in the packet and <br />said that light rail transit has a greater potential to promote economic growth. He gave an <br />example of Indianapolis, which just passed a transportation plan, which included significant rail. <br />He said that the resolution needs to be modified to include significant additions to bus <br />transportation from here to Durham County. He said that asking for another tax increase would <br />not be good at this time. <br />Ted Triebel lives in Caldwell. He said that the issue is funding support. He referred to an article <br />in the News and Observer on February 1St that indicated that local dollars should be a sure thing <br />before proceeding. He said that there needs to be some clarity before this moves forward. <br />Chair Pelissier said that tonight the only decision before the Board is to vote on the locally <br />preferred alternative. She said that the full plan would come back before the public for comment <br />in the near future if they decide to put it on the ballot. The entire plan does involve buses as well <br />as the potential light rail. Next week there will be a work session to discuss these issues related <br />to the plan. <br />Craig Benedict said that the resolution is from the Durham-Chapel Hill MPO. The words <br />in red are wording that Orange County staff heard at the TCC but this wording was not <br />incorporated into the MPO-TAC resolution. Over the last few days, the MPO staff understands <br />that this is language that Orange County may want. He made reference to page 7, which lists <br />decision points. <br />