Browse
Search
2002 NS MOUSchools Adequate Facilities Memorandum of Understanding
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Memorandum of Understanding
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
2002 NS MOUSchools Adequate Facilities Memorandum of Understanding
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2012 12:40:08 PM
Creation date
5/2/2012 12:40:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
MOU
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County Board of Commissioners <br />Page 3 <br />September 29, 2000 <br />permit residential growth, the County must fund sufficient <br />facilities and the schools must educate the children resulting <br />from that residential growth. <br />The only sound approach to balancing school facilities and <br />residential growth student generation would be to regularly <br />chart the school children "generated" by growth projections to <br />see what school construction will be required. This can be <br />compared with a fiscal limiting chart. If the two charted lines <br />"cross," work needs to be done. More money must be found for <br />school construction or County-wide growth limiting land use <br />regulations must be implemented. <br />To what degree is school capacity affected by student- <br />teacher ratio decisions? <br />In the context of an adequate public school facilities <br />program, any student-teacher ratio change that changes school <br />capacity must be approved by the schools and the Coun~,y. That ±~~'~ <br />is, if the certificates can be impacted by student-teacher ratio <br />decisions of the school boards, the County must be on board. . <br />That is not to say that the schools cannot create their own <br />teacher-pupil ratios. However, those unilateral school board <br />decisions cannot affect.the adequate public school facilities <br />program until and unless the County is on board with the <br />changes. And, whether the County is on board on school board <br />approved student-teacher ratios beyond the adequate public <br />school facilities program is, in my opinion, in Orange County, a <br />political one. On the other hand, the County cannot arbitrarily <br />say no to school capacity changes that are the result of <br />teacher-student ratio changes that are mandated at State and <br />federal levels. <br />This "issue" does not prompt a question. Rather it prompts <br />a comment. There are several places in the draft ordinance that <br />need some "wordsmithing." Particularly the section dealing with <br />exemptions, the section dealing with appeals of denials of a <br />CAPS, particularly the part about the governing board making a <br />"recommendation," and the section of the MOU related to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.