Browse
Search
2002 NS MOUSchools Adequate Facilities Memorandum of Understanding
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Memorandum of Understanding
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
2002 NS MOUSchools Adequate Facilities Memorandum of Understanding
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2012 12:40:08 PM
Creation date
5/2/2012 12:40:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
MOU
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 12-10-2002-9a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 12-10-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County Board of Commissioners <br />Page 2 <br />September 29, 2000 <br />The memorandum of understanding also incorporates the <br />service levels and requires the schools to consider a number of <br />factors, including: number of students presently enrolled; <br />projected or ongoing construction of schools or permanent <br />expansion of existing schools; projected increases in enrollment <br />due to residential grow~h as determined by approved building <br />lots and other developments in progress and "any other factors <br />deemed relevant by the school district in determining whether <br />each school level of service [will be exceeded if the] project <br />is constructed." <br />To what degree can the County's financial ability to <br />respond to school needs and projected school needs be one of the <br />"other factors" considered by the schools in making certificate <br />decisions? Put another way, can the Adequate Public School <br />Facilities Program be used to limit the amount of residential <br />development by budget decisions to allocate or not~~money for <br />school construction?- <br />. ~ <br />.~~ <br />It is not contemplated by an adequate public facilities y <br />program that the tools, the ordinances and the MOU, are growth- <br />limiting devices. Rather, the chief objective of these tools is <br />to provide a reasonable amount of time for the County as the <br />fiscal agent and the schools aG the education agent to respond <br />to the impact of residential growth on.the schools. That is, <br />they allow both the County and the schools to reasonably respond <br />to the pace of development. Therefore, the degree to which the <br />County is willing to spend money on school construction is not <br />an "other" factor to be considered by the schools in issuing <br />certificates. <br />On the other hand, the County does not have to bankrupt <br />itself and its citizens to keep school construction current with <br />population increases. That is to say, the County can establish, <br />in some broad sense debt service goals which if exceeded would <br />have the impact of severely weakening Orange County's financial <br />condition. Frankly, before the County reaches that level of <br />fiscal despair, there must be a loud hue and cry for residential <br />development land use limitation changes. If land use regulations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.