Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-03-2012 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 05-03-2012 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 05-03-2012 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2015 12:16:03 PM
Creation date
5/1/2012 9:36:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/2012
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-03-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br />Draft Orange County Transit Plan FAQ <br />In addition to this existing transportation demand, integrated planning by the <br />Town of Chapel Hill has led to the implementation of local land use decisions and <br />considerable transit investments in the NC 54 corridor (including Meadowmont <br />and East 54 developments and increases in Chapel Hill Transit and Triangle Transit <br />bus services). <br />Due to this planning, the NC 54 corridor to the UNC Campus and Chapel Hill is the <br />most heavily used market for transit services in Orange County, with more than <br />6,000 riders boarding buses each weekday. As the region and the area grows, the <br />demand for transit will increase in the NC 54 corridor, and the increased capacity <br />provided by light rail will enable a more cost effective long term transit solution <br />while greatly enhancing regional transit mobility and supporting local economic <br />development efforts. <br />Q5: Why was Light Rail Transit (LRT) chosen as the preferred alternative over <br />Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)? <br />A5: The corridor between Durham and Chapel Hill, including the segment along <br />NC54, is among the most heavily traveled corridors in the region and needs a high <br />capacity transit solution to address long term mobility needs. LRT was selected <br />for several reasons: <br />• LRT has a proven track record in North America for enhancing transit- <br />oriented development, whereas the performance of BRT in this area is less <br />established. The ability to focus growth and support increased <br />development around transit stations is particularly important in a fast <br />growing region such as ours. <br />• While BRT is often cheaper to build, one of the benefits of LRT is its ability <br />to move more people at a lower cost per passenger than BRT by linking <br />multiple train cars together, and over the long term this means lower costs <br />to operate the transit system. <br />• LRT offers faster and more reliable end-to-end travel times than BRT <br />• LRT's electric power supply reduces reliance on petroleum-based fuels. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.