Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-01-2012 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 05-01-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-01-2012 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2015 2:10:55 PM
Creation date
4/27/2012 11:21:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-01-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 <br /> 1 policy that Orange County will not support ANY site for a potential WTS that would be located <br /> 2 anywhere within the Rural Buffer surrounding Chapel Hill/Carrboro. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 We and the homeowners we represent are firmly united in our opposition to the proposed <br /> 5 NC86/140 site, and together we are fully committed to take whatever action necessary, including <br /> 6 legal means, to protect the integrity of the Rural Buffer in order to preserve the intent, character <br /> 7 and beauty of this precious region for decades to come. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 We certainly appreciate that solving our County's future solid waste disposal needs is a difficult <br /> 10 and complex issue, and we are very willing to work together with our elected officials and other <br /> 11 stakeholders to identify more suitable, "21St-century" solutions that the entire community can <br /> 12 support. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Respectfully yours, <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Michael A. Recny <br /> 18 President, Creek Wood HOA (representing 64 properties) <br /> 19 <br /> 20 VikramRao <br /> 21 President, Stoneridge POA (representing 230 properties) <br /> 22 <br /> 23 W. L. Triplett <br /> 24 President, Lockridge HOA (representing 30 properties) <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Ed Lowdermilk <br /> 27 President, Falls of New Hope HOA (representing 92 properties) <br /> 28 <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Bill O'Neil <br /> 31 Vice President, North Hills HOA (representing 20 properties) <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Jack Olich <br /> 34 President of Old Field Drive HOA (representing 7 properties) <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Mary Miller <br /> 37 President, Woodkirk HOA (representing 8 properties) <br /> 38 <br /> 39 <br /> 40 1 am writing this letter to the Commissioners of Orange County, and also the elected leaders of <br /> 41 Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Hillsborough. In simplest terms, I do not support a waste transfer <br /> 42 station in the Rural Buffer. As an engineer, I would like to share some potentially nontraditional <br /> 43 thoughts on this subject with you. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 1. No professional industrial or process engineer would consider implementing an <br /> 46 "intermediate stage" process without knowing the final downstream or end state <br /> 47 processes for the future. A waste transfer station is an "intermediate stage" process. <br /> 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.