Orange County NC Website
21 <br /> Orange County Staff research from recent FTA publications agrees with conclusions drawn <br /> therein that BRT-H with all of the amenities of LRT offer comparable benefit and experience and <br /> accordingly offers a higher ranking than URS. ** <br /> Ability to Influence/Economic Development and TOD <br /> LRT— High Performing <br /> BRT— high High Performing ** <br /> Orange County staff believes investment and implementation can be faster, as permanent and <br /> less speculative than LRT especially when LRT could take 15 years to analyze and put into <br /> operation. <br /> Capacity <br /> LRT— High Performing <br /> BRT— high High Performing <br /> Operating Costs <br /> LRT— > 2000-2500 Passengers per peak hour <br /> LRT may have cost efficiencies <br /> BRT— high < 2500 BRT is less <br /> BRT Cost savings with 800 PAX/HR of approximately 20% <br /> The Durham-Orange Corridor is projected to operate with BRT better operating efficiency levels. <br /> Environmental Air&Wetlands <br /> LRT— Medium Performing depending on source of electric which is coal at this <br /> time <br /> BRT— high Medium Performing however most BRT new orders are hybrid electric <br /> BRT can be routed to be less invasive to off corridor (right-of-way) environmental areas. <br /> Summary <br /> FTA 2009 publications (see link: http://www.nbrti.org/CBRT.html) note and Orange County staff <br /> agrees that a community should match the technology with the need based on land use and the <br /> ability to financially build and maintain. BRT-High is such a system that is complementary to <br /> these precepts in the BRT ability to remain flexible to changing conditions and locational needs <br /> including the exponential rate of green technologies. <br /> Although Orange County and the municipalities are expected to grow in population and jobs over <br /> the long term planning horizon (25t years), the estimates do not create high intensity skyscraper <br /> urban environments because of the limitations with other natural resources such as water and the <br /> costs of public services. (Attachment F) <br /> Additional Supporting Maps—(Attachments G. H, I, J) <br /> Resolution/Orange County Staff Recommendation — Attachment K is a draft resolution for <br /> the DCHC MPO Transportation Advisory Committee's consideration at its meeting tomorrow, <br /> February 8, 2012. Orange County staff is recommending changes, as shown in red, "tracked <br /> changes" format. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: This action, although not the approval of a financial plan or 'h cent <br /> referendum, begins a process outlining a potential financial commitment by local (Durham and <br /> Orange Counties) state and federal governments of$1.4 billion and an ongoing Y2 cent sales tax <br /> commitment from Orange County residents. <br />