Orange County NC Website
18 <br /> In late August, 2011, as a result of ongoing technical evaluation, public involvement and <br /> discussions with government agencies, the MPOs and other key stakeholders, an Addendum <br /> was prepared for each of the Detailed Definition of Alternatives Technical Reports. This <br /> additional information is also posted on the aforementioned project web site. <br /> Triangle Transit has stated that the LPA must be approved by the Durham Chapel Hill Carrboro <br /> (DCHC) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) by <br /> mid-February 2012 to make the deadline for federal New Starts applications (mid-August 2012). <br /> At its November 15. 2011 meeting the BOCC received a presentation on the Triangle Regional <br /> Transit Program —Alternatives Analysis (AA) and the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) and the <br /> BOCC identified additional information for upcoming work sessions. <br /> Since the December 8t' 2011 Special Transit Work Session, county staff has met with a majority <br /> of the Commissioners and compiled a list of questions concerning the Alternatives Analysis and <br /> the Locally Preferred Alternative. The questions are organized into general categories including <br /> ridership, commuting patterns, the preferred corridor (including Orange County economic <br /> development potential) and technology (i.e. LRT vs. BRT) and submitted to TTA on Friday <br /> afternoon, January 20, 2012 for their responses for the January 24, 2012 regular BOCC meeting. <br /> TTA was not able to respond in writing at that time but pledged to have answers by noon on <br /> Thursday, February 2, 2012. In the absence of a response, Orange County staff makes the <br /> following comments: <br /> Attachment A, Questions Regarding the Orange County Transit Plan as it Relates to the <br /> Alternatives Analysis and Locally Preferred Alternative and TTA responses received <br /> Thursday 2/2/12 at 5:OOpm. Staff will comment on this latter information prior to the meeting. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> The agenda item relates to the following: <br /> Transitional Analysis Report of 9/24/10 <br /> Purpose and Need Report of 12/9/10 <br /> Volume1: Detailed Definition of Alternatives Technical Report of July 2011 prepared by <br /> consultant URS prepared for Triangle Transit <br /> The Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) and AA include intertwined 3 facets that are specific to <br /> the Durham-Orange County Corridor and Study Area: <br /> The end points of the corridor <br /> The approximate alignment within the study corridor <br /> The technology of the fixed guideway meaning light rapid transit (LRT) or bus rapid transit (BRT <br /> high or low) and/or in some cases commuter rail (e.g. between Durham and Wake) <br /> Staff comments are as follows regarding the 3 aspects which are linked by number to the <br /> aspects: <br /> End points <br /> The suggested corridor is known as Durham-Orange Alternate 4 (D-O A4) which is a 17.4 mile <br /> length between UNC Hospitals and Alston Avenue which is east of Duke and Durham downtown. <br /> The approximate cost is $1.4 billion or over$80 million a mile. The other alternates are shown in <br /> Attachment B, all with mobility, socio-economic, land use and financial rankings. Staff believes <br /> these end points of D-O A4 are appropriate because of the strong employment anchor UNC <br /> hospital and university at the southern terminus within Orange County. <br />