Orange County NC Website
associated with merger. Other avenues for improving quality should be investigated <br />and attempted before settling on a merger as a course of action. The PTA Council <br />recognizes that there are legitimate concerns aver haw education in Orange County is <br />funded. The PTA Council supports establishing a system of education funding for <br />Orange County that would give each school district the ability to provide funding at a <br />level appropriate to the circumstances of the community served. The PTA Council also <br />urges both school districts' boards of education to identify and implement collaborative <br />programs that will provide cost savings or improve the quality of services. I have copies <br />for all of you. I would now ask for the community who supports this statement to please <br />stand quietly. Thank you. <br />David Laudicina: I just wanted to comment on some of the phrases and words <br />popping around in all this stuff. Collaboration -I've been hearing about collaboration <br />since I moved to Orange County in 1991. In fact, I talked about it with Moses when the <br />East Chapel Hill School was going to be built. He assured me that the boards were <br />going to get together and we were going to collaborate and be able to utilize that. So I <br />voted far the bond. I would not have voted for it if I had known that I was not going to <br />get collaboration. That's all -hearing nothing is ever done. These last minute promises <br />of collaboration ring pretty hollow given collaboration's history. Besides, dangling a <br />promise of a few slats in the City district schools is not providing equal educational <br />opportunity for all. Bussing - I guess it's ok to send Orange County students on bus <br />rides all over creation, an hour each way to get to schools. Why can't students, far <br />example, southern Orange County district students have an opportunity to attend <br />schools that are closest to them? Their parents are paying now; they will pay in the <br />future far the building bonds to finance Chapel Hill district buildings, yet they are <br />excluded from using them. In the future, without a merger, they will be sending down <br />five cents to Chapel Hill far every one-cent to build County schools. Increased spending <br />does not increase performance - I'm amazed that anyone can stand up here and try <br />and convince us with a straight face, not being able to afford Spanish teachers and not <br />providing the Spanish program to our students won't affect our children's performance? <br />The list of programs the County has not realized because of budget requests not being <br />fully funded goes on and on and continues to widen the educational opportunity Chapel <br />Hill district students enjoy over Urange County district students. Merging won't save <br />any money - I was encouraged to read in the Chapel Hill Herald on Tuesday that <br />studies done on both districts support the premise that merging the schools would <br />cause huge efficiencies and that a merged County school system would better utilize <br />capacity, significantly postponing or avoiding new school construction. This is a direct <br />savings to the taxpayer and mast likely offsets much of the difference between separate <br />school systems with individual district taxes and a merged system with only one tax <br />rate. Most of the capacity sharing doesn't occur until after 2010, giving us plenty of time <br />to equalize the educational opportunity offered in all schools in grange County. A <br />merged systems means we will turn into Cary -look around, development is happening <br />now and will continue to happen. We have that beast over there called the Research <br />Triangle that is going to grow whether we like it or nat. Thankfully, we have elected <br />officials that try to maintain the quality of life we have in the County and support things <br />like rural buffers and sustainable development. We're number one, you're number four. <br />