Orange County NC Website
seems to be very responsive - a small system. One of my major concerns about the <br />merger is that we'll be dealing with a larger system that won't be as responsive. You <br />know, I see small groups of students or individual schools and the school board <br />responding well to an individual school's or system's needs. And a larger system is <br />probably not going to be able to da that respectively. The second point I think is the <br />funding issue. And when I look at the material provided here tonight by the folks against <br />merger, it disturbs me to see that the Orange County schools, the people in the Orange <br />County school system feel that they are not adequately funded; their needs are not <br />adequately being met. But, that being said, I think that given the options we've seen <br />given tonight, there's a lot of smack people in this room, we should be able to find a way <br />to meet the needs of the Orange County system without necessarily going through the <br />whole process of merger, which itself may be inefficient, which may introduce other <br />expenses. We have other options. We have a countywide tax, we have an OCS tax, <br />and other special district taxes, and we have some combination of those methods that <br />may be able to address this problem. Finally, something a little bit closer to my heart is <br />the problem we may run into as a countywide Schaal system if we are forced to have <br />equal funding of all pupils. Now, in Chapel Hill, I've lived there now 13 years, and I've <br />been happily paying a higher rate of taxes than the folks in Orange County for the <br />education that our children get. And I don't mind paying that. And I've known for some <br />years that we have a lot more ESL, English as Second Language students, we have <br />more special needs students than the rest of the County. If we put ourselves in the <br />position of having to force equal funding far all of the students, we may, in Chapel Hill <br />for example, run into the problem of not having enough funding for these particular <br />groups of students, and if the one school system decides that they want to fund more <br />for this, well my view is that they should be allowed to do that. And if we are forced into <br />equal funding for everybody, we may not have that flexibility. Thank you again for your <br />time tonight and the opportunity to speak. <br />Elizabeth Brown: Thank you. I'll say it again. It's a good thing we didn't ask the <br />voters about integration, or every person in here would look the same. Why don't we <br />just move to Chapel Hill? Poverty is a messy thing. So are families in trouble. And <br />poor children from troubled homes can be the most difficult of all -the neediest, the <br />most painful to look at, because we knave how awful their situation is and how good it <br />could be. These kids usually need more resources than those from healthier families. <br />One third of the students in Orange County schools come from families' poor enough to <br />qualify for federal free ar reduced lunch. Imagine splitting the room here into one third, <br />having that many disadvantaged students. Our neighbors in Chapel Hill have only 13% <br />of children in that program. Last year I read regularly with first graders at Grady Brown <br />Elementary. One little boy obviously came from a poor home. He was a goad reader, <br />and he wouldn't let me go when his turn was over. "Can you read with your mom or dad <br />tonight?" I asked. He shook his head. "Daddy was being mean to us, so they took him <br />away." Of course I mentioned this to the teacher and she confirmed that the father had <br />been removed from the home for beating the mother and the children. Every time I <br />walked into that classroom, he'd run over to me. He wanted attention. He had trouble <br />with his temper. Where could he get the help that he needed? The teacher was busy <br />teaching; a social worker comes only once a week because she serves three schools in <br />