Browse
Search
NS ORD-2002-033 Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2002
>
NS ORD-2002-033 Telecommunications Tower Ordinance Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2017 12:24:36 PM
Creation date
4/26/2012 10:39:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/2/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20021202
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_��.�_......._. �...�..��.......__.... 4:::. f:.:.'.::.._.. ntYi\ �.: �: :..:,:,ll \.AUq.:KU:.....4.1,.,:ti :':.:..:�•.i'�`a:.:.:. <br />SEP -Or -2002 02:1TPM FROM - PENNINGTON AND LOTT +18039291075 <br />t T -379 P -007 /008 F -403 <br />a. Requiring that the communications tower be placed In a <br />wooded area to the extent that such exists . and Is <br />available for use, <br />f. Limiting lighting on the communications tower. <br />5• Fall zone. Section 8.8.17x.1 a.a., Page 14 (Site Plan Requirements), <br />and Section 8.8.178.2.a., Page 18. The fall zone requirements have <br />been increased by Ten (10) % percent. The first issue Is that there is <br />no definition for "fall zone" given in the Ordinance. I assume that this <br />means that distance within which the communications tower would <br />fall in the unlikely event it should fail, as certified by a professional <br />engineer licensed in the State of North Carolina. Some jurisdictions <br />define the fall zone as the height of the communications tower (a one <br />for one ratio). Clarification is needed in this Ordinance. Also, the <br />increase In not necessary. Communications towers, and * especially. <br />monopoles which this Ordinance will dictate, do not fall over like pine <br />trees. In the unlikely event of a failure, the top of the communications <br />tower would buckle over at a designed point, and the top of the <br />communications tower would never even hit the ground. 1 can assure <br />You that the wind would not blow the tower along the ground as <br />suggested at the last meeting. <br />6. GROUND LIGHTING. Page 18. The Ordinance now requires that <br />lighting on the equipment building be shielded so as not to be visible <br />from adjacent properties. This is impossible. In a wide open area, a <br />Forty (40) watt light bulb may be visible from a mile a way. regardless <br />of the type. of shield used. This sentence- should be rewritten. The <br />standard should be that no light is allowed to be projected onto <br />adjacent, properties, not visible, for this is not possible. The light is for <br />security and safety reasons, both of 'Which are more - overriding <br />concerns than the potential visibility from adjacent properties. The <br />light can be isolated to light only the equipment building and the base <br />of the communications tower. No more, no less, but it will be visible <br />from outside the compound. <br />F:1V®tIZ0M1NC<OR.1N66 COUMY E0i4G101C0yQMMNT3 RIIOA =G T= ORD4VA = TO AMFAP THR ZONWO "al"4c¢ 01 OMNGZ COUMV <br />RBGARFINO.doe <br />79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.